Ingenieur Vol 61 January-March 2015 | Page 78

INGENIEUR RECOMMENDATION Based on the comprehensive comparison between the RFID and QR technologies, and their features and capabilities, we need to consider several issues before implementation in industrial projects. Both technologies have their own advantages and disadvantages. For example, QR codes are easier and cheaper to use, and also do not need specific requirements and installations. Therefore, QR codes are preferable in small businesses; and in the industries with lower priced products or products with short expiry such as food. On the other hand, RFID technology is more flexible, has more memory capacity and fully automatic. But being more costly, it is preferable in industries with long production line and/or distribution chain; or in the industries with valuable products. REFERENCES RFID technology is more flexible, has more memory capacity and fully automatic. Traceability Management for Agro-product Quality and Safety in China,” in Proceedings of 2013 World Agricultural Outlook Conference, 2014, pp. 295306. ISO, “Traceabilit y of f inf ish products Specification on the information to be recorded in captured finfish distribution chains,” vol. ISO 12875:2011(en), ed. Technical Committee ISO/TC 234: ISO, 2011. I. R. Center. (2014, 17 Dec 2014). ISO 22000: Traceability in Food Supply Chains / Critical Tracking Events - V. Available: http:// iso22000resourcecenter.blogspot.com/2014/05/ iso-22000-traceability-in-food-supply_30.html ISO, “Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary,” ed. Technical Committee ISO/TC 176: ISO, 2005. D. Krebs and M. Liard, “White Paper: Global Markets and Applications for Radio Frequency Identification,” Venture Development Corporation, 2001. E. H. Golan, B. Krissoff, and F. Kuchler, “Food traceability: One ingredient in a safe and efficient food supply,” Amber Waves, 2004. G. Smith, J. Tatum, K. Belk, J. Scanga, T. Grandin, and J. Sofos, “Traceability from a US perspective,” Meat science, vol. 71, pp. 174-193, 2005. M. Shakiba, A. Zavvari, and E. Sundararajan, “Fitted dynamic framed slotted ALOHA anticollision algorithm in RFID systems,” in International Conference on Information Technology and Multimedia (ICIM), 2011, pp. 1-6. E. Golan, B. Krissoff, and F. Kuchler, “USDA Economic Research Service-Food Traceability: One Ingredient in a Safe and Efficient Food Supply,” 2014. M. Shakiba, M. J. Singh, E. Sundararajan, A. Zavvari, and M. T. Islam, “Extending Birthday Paradox Theory to Estimate the Number of Tags in RFID Systems,” PloS one, vol. 9, p. e95425, 2014. D. Asioli, A. Boecker, and M. Canavari, “On the linkages between traceability levels and expected and actual traceability costs and benefits in the Italian fishery supply chain,” Food Control, vol. 46, pp. 10-17, 2014. T. Lotlikar, R. Kankapurkar, A. Parekar, and A. Mohite, “Comparative study of Barcode, QR-code and RFID System,” IJCTA, vol. 4, p. 5, 2013. F. Schwägele, “Traceability from a European perspective,” Meat science, vol. 71, pp. 164-173, 2005. S. Chen, D. Wang, W. Wang, L. Yang, and Y. Qian, “Analysis on the Technology Application of 6 76 VOL 61 JANUARY – MARCH 2015 VOL 55 JUNE 2013 M. Ward, R. V. Kranenburg, and G. Backhouse, “RFID: Frequency, standards, adoption and innovation,” JISC Technology and standards Watch, vol