INGENIEUR
Types of Contract Reference As-Built Drawings Submission Timeline
JKR Contract 203A ( Revised 1 / 2010 )
Preliminaries
30 days after the issuance of the Certificate of Practical Completion
PAM Contract 2006 |
Clause 3.10 |
Within time specified … where not |
|
|
specified before the Completion Date |
CIDB Standard Form of Contract For Building Works 2000 Edition
Clause 4.10
Not later than three months from the Date of Practical Completion of Works
Table 2 : Comparison of Contracts in Malaysia
office in later years resulted in the loss of some of the drawings . However , in the digital era , with computerisation , drawings can be easily stored and shared . Design can also be done in a short time .
A comparison of contracts widely used in Malaysia indicates different submission timelines for As-Built Drawings . They are shown in Table 2 .
In cases where As-Built Drawings are submitted after Practical Completion , it may not be of utmost priority or interest to deliver the As- Built Drawings by the contractor as they may have been under-priced . In cases where they have been under-priced , they may be willing to offset the price of providing the As-Built Drawings . To ensure As-Built drawings are delivered , it is recommended that As-Built Drawings be submitted by the contractor before the date of practical completion .
It is recommended that drawings including As- Built drawings are kept in a systematic manner . For such a significant building , all drawings should be kept centralised and designated to an assigned office especially within a large organisation . Another proposal is to have the drawings microfilmed and sent to the National Archive Department for future record .
Occupants in Building During the year 1986 when rehabilitation and renovations were carried out , the works were carried out with occupants in the Parliament building . Works had to be scheduled to ensure that no construction works were carried out during Parliamentary sessions . This was not clearly stipulated in the tender documents . During Parliament sessions , the proceedings were held from Monday to Thursday from 10.00am to 5.00pm . Therefore works could only be carried out after 5pm until the next day . Sometimes the proceedings ended late at night . The days that the contractor could work normally were limited to Friday to Sunday every week . In the earlier renovation contracts , these conditions were not stipulated in the contract and were used as a basis for an Extension of Time . In later contracts , these schedules and situations were clearly spelt out in the contract to ensure the contractor was not entitled for an Extension of Time . However with adequate budget , it is also advisable in major rehabilitation works to relocate the occupants to another building where the contractor can work freely at the site . This was done in the subsequent rehabilitation works .
Clients Brief Confirmation There were several design presentations by the PWD to Parliament as their client . Their client consisted of not one but several hierarchies of stakeholders and end users , which were duly acknowledged . They included the Parliament Administration Office , the Members of Parliament and both the Speakers . All requests and needs on the clients side were taken into account , analysed over statutory requirements as well as budget allocation before translating them into the design process . As several design changes were requested , proposals were amended several times and presented until finalised and confirmed by the client before tendering . Although the process of amending and proposing the design took time , it was vital to avoid major Variation Orders during the contract implementation and management phases .
78 VOL 86 APRIL-JUNE 2021