Informante 14-20 November 2013 | Page 6

6| INFORMANTÉ 14 November - 20 November 2013 LETTERS/EDITORIAL Retrospective letters Disclaimer Letters appearing on this page do not carry the opinion of Informanté Newspaper or Trustco Group International but those of individual authors. Informanté reserves the right to shorten the letters to 300 words or less and to offer a right of reply. [email protected] Kaunda’s house in Windhoek By Nghidipo Nangolo Preparing 2014 elections in time is the key NEXT year, the national elections will be in full swing, and the fever can already be felt rising from all sides of the political spectrum. It is an opportunity for the Electoral Commission (ECN) to put all mechanisms in place to ensure that no one will conceive an idea unnecessarily to claim that the election has been rigged, or that it was unfair. There’s no time to grandstand on how great a nation Namibia is by voting every fifth year. The veracity is in the mistakes of the previous elections made by omission, deliberately, or sheer cunning by the powers that be. The 2014 elections are expected to be flawless in nature and character, to avoid monotonous and back and forth allegations, and sometimes proven facts of election rigging or unfairness. To achieve that milestone, the ECN needs to up its game now, and ensure voter education does not only take place from January to March next year, but that it becomes an integral part of our democratic culture. Despite assurances of good planning and flawless electoral legislation in the past, there’s no doubt that the electoral law needs to be brought up to speed with the reality of the meaning of a free and fair ballot, in order to refute any ambiguities that have been dogging the ECN as legitimised by an ineffective legislation in the last 23 years. The anticipated amendments to the electoral law should leave no unanswered questions about the validity of the forthcoming 2014 elections, or loopholes that could be exploited for political expediency. However, it was flabbergasting to hear technocrats and public servants making a case for an antiquated voting mode by sworn statement, notwithstanding the glitches, such as foreign or ghost voters in the past election. Voting is a right of every eligible citizen, but in common law, voting without national documents is also a transgression of the same constitution. Two wrongs can never make a right. What needs to be addressed is the competency of Home Affairs to provide all citizens with IDs, passports, birth certificates, and, most importantly, not only issue death certificates, but update the death register to ensure that dead people don’t end up on the voter register, as insinuated in the past. Technocrats and civil servants are not lawmakers or politicians, and therefore have no agreement with the citizenry to promote or make a case for voting under sworn statement. The practice should be abolished without any delay. Reports this week indicate that some Home Affairs offices in the country are out of action, notwithstanding the usual criticism of poor service, lack of basic equipment (cameras), incompetent staff, selling of national documents to foreigners, and bribery charges. That’s the kind of stuff that the Home Affairs PS should be looking at to solve, and subsequently support the smooth running of the 2014 election. They say if you can’t offer solutions, don’t exacerbate old problems. Now that the nation will vote electronically for the first time, it should be a challenge that needs to be conquered to inspire confidence in technology, and not discredit the new voting mode at the end of the elections. Voter education should be visible in all communication mediums to ensure that the messages reach every literate or illiterate citizen. As for the political parties, acting by example will get every eligible voter to return the favour by acting orderly and with patience, in a free and fair, democratic election. It should be acknowledged that the victory of the party that will win the 2014 election will eventually be the victory of Namibia and all its citizens, despite political differences. The losers will be those that are hell-bent on rigging the elections for their political parties, not knowing that any trickery will eventually catch up with its initiator. DISCLAIMER • The newspaper’s views are not necessarily that of our advertisers and the views aired in letters are not necessarily those of the newspaper. • Informanté publishes all advertisements in good faith and cannot be held liable for any misrepresentation, losses or injury to any reader making use of the products or services advertised. INFORMANTÉ • Newspaper registration: 06/01/119 FINGERTIPS • Printed by Newsprint, Windhoek Tel 061 297 2000 • 260 000 copies distributed monthly to all major Namibian centres • Headquarters: Trustco House, 2 Keller Street, Windhoek, Namibia • Contact: Tel. 061 275 4102 Fax. 061 275 4090 email. [email protected] • Electronic: www.informante.web.na AS much as we are all aware of the drought situation facing our country, we are also aware that the government is trying it best to minimize the effects of disastrous phenomenon. However, this is not my topic nor is what I want to write about. I feel I have voice to say as much it is my dull duty as a citizen of this country. I want to talk is about the donated house to the former Zambian president. Why should we Namibian forget so easily? Why are we Namibians so selfish? Why should we have to link this issue to every occurrence in this country? It’s only taken 23 years to forget all the suffering our people have to endure for 100 years! I once was in exile and have seen how we as Namibians made these people (Zambia, Angolan, and Cubans etc.) suffer because of our presence there. And I know the people were not happy at all, and it is because of this firm, brave leadership by the likes of Kaunda, Agustinho Neto and others we managed to be accommodated in their territories. Angola and Zambia suffered emotional and economically, were made to be battlefields by the white minority who terrorised all the inhabitants of these two great countries, so that they cannot support us! Today the same people are now behind doors promoting hatred and distorts information through the so-called news and SMS in the public and private newspapers. It is shameful to read every now and then people complain about useless things. The money donated has done nothing to alleviate poverty, being donated or not this money was not made for that specific project, therefore Namibians must learn to appreciate what others have done for us as a Nation. Pages on my Mind BOB KANDETU Adventure Travel Summit in Namibia: What an Achievement! THE world converged on Namibia with 650 bookings culminating into a total audience of 700 from around the globe to witness this adventure, the first on the African continent. This is the global hub for the adventure industry, and indeed a growing sector of the tourism global industry. Little wonder that the secretary-general of the United Nations World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) was impelled to exclaim that “Adventure travel is the future of tourism”. Evidently, Namibians had little understanding of what was destined to hit the country, but given the nation’s capacity to welcome all but keep the best, this one was among the best, to be overrun only by the FIFA World Cup, still to hit the shores of the Land of the Brave. This summit brought to- gether decision makers in the adventure travel and tourism industry, who, after all formalities, focused on a single over-arching subject, interrogating how best to make adventure tourism an industry of businesses that is profitable, planet friendly, and supportive of local economies. Delegates to the summit covered a number of sectors: international tour operators about 55%; media about 15%. Delegates included outlets such as AFAR, Backpackers, BBC, Comde Nast, National Geographic, and Men’s Journal. The summit came to Namibia against the backdrop of the 2010 summit: Visit to Scotland, believed to have yielded about USD1,6 million for that country. The organisers for the Namibian summit intended to showcase the country as the world’s preferred tour- ist destination, and banking on a projected number of 600 participants, they anticipated the country to benefit from hotel bookings, an estimated 650 to include those who travelled with families, meals and bar tabs all around, local operators to connect to international partners, media and buyers, increasing connectivity and direct sales. Just how did this go, what benefits accrued to Namibia and, was it worth the trouble? Maggy Mbako of the Public Relations Unit in the Namibia Tourism Board contends that this was a unique experience and that the summit went very well. They had planned this with the intention that it remains on the minds of people globally for the ensuing ten years, and she is confident that it will happen. The Tourism Board recorded that representatives of about The house given to an old man is just a symbol of the recognition for what the Zambian people have done for all of us. It was through their sacrifices that today most of you born-free are enjoying freedom and good education in this country. The donated house will remain a symbol of appreciation and will serve as symbol of unification for both nations. Kaunda is old and soon or later he will go where all of us will go, but this property will remain there for the future and will serve all Zambians. - Comrade I. Kanamutenya 50 media houses globally attended the summit, and this was the bonus for Namibia to be marketed internationally. Even more encouraging, was that during the pre and post summit expeditions about 49 packages were sold, out of which 27 went to conservancies around the country. I heard the Minister of Environment and Tourism say on radio that the estimated income from this four-day summit revolved around N$30 million. This was a first for Namibia, a society often treated to a litany of deficits accruing to ministries and state-owned institutions as a result of erratic management of international conventions. The Adventure Travel World Summit reflected well on the tourism industry in general, and on Namibia in particular. The challenge remains with Minister Uahekua Herunga, the Namibia Tourism Board, and the broad hospitality movement in Namibia to pick the mettle and sustain the momentum for the advent of adventure tourism in Namibia. Needless to belabour, this exercise was a stage-setter for serious endeavours aimed at national development.