IN Woodland Hills Winter 2016 | Page 16

INDUSTRY INSIGHT DIVORCE SPONSORED CONTENT Is “No-Court Divorce” Possible? Yes It Is! Collaborative Divorce T HERE IS A “NEW” APPROACH TO GETTING A DIVORCE. IT’S CALLED “COLLABORATIVE DIVORCE” AND I HOPE YOU WILL KEEP READING FOR THE BENEFIT OF FRIENDS, FAMILY OR EVEN YOURSELF. In a Collaborative Divorce, the couple and their specially trained lawyers all agree they will not go to court and will instead, in a series of meetings, discuss the issues and come to resolution on all matters, including custody, child support, division of assets, alimony and even the pets! It’s a respectful way to resolve differences, and can also involve other specially trained professionals in the financial and mental health professions who educate, support and guide couples in reaching balanced and thoughtful decisions. Parties agree to fully disclose information to each other, and that information is exchanged, reviewed and discussed at the table. Meetings are usually 1-2 hours and can be held wherever the group decide s. It proves to be an efficient and much less costly approach compared to a litigationmodel divorce involving much posturing by the lawyers, many letters, trips to court and an eventual trial. In a Collaborative Divorce, a marital settlement agreement is drafted and signed, and the divorce can be finalized much more quickly. I’m sure many of you have heard stories about, or maybe even personally experienced, the horrors of a prolonged, contentious, ugly, expensive litigation-model divorce or custody battle. The costs of getting divorced or deciding custody can escalate quickly, especially if experts need to be hired or formal discovery is required. In some cases, the costs can exceed $100,000. The “scorched earth” approach to divorce results in much animosity between the parties, even where it didn’t exist before. And, in a litigation-model divorce, the children, even adult children, suffer for the rest of their lives trying to deal with the fallout from the contentious divorce of their parents. It is important to try to decide together, before either party hires a lawyer, to use the Collaborative Process, as not all lawyers are interested in trying to settle a case amicably. I happen to be one of the founding members of the Collaborative Law Association of Southwestern Pennsylvania (CLASP), a group of approximately 100 collaborative lawyers and other professionals who decided to change the approach to divorce 10 years ago. CLASP This Industry Insight was written by Kathleen D. Schneider. Attorney Schneider, both a lawyer and a CPA, is a founding member of the Collaborative Law Association of Southwestern Pennsylvania (CLASP) and maintains a general law practice in Edgewood where she focuses on family law, divorce, taxation, estates and trusts, adoption, LGBT issues, real estate and small business start-ups. Please visit her website at www.kdschneiderlawoffice.com. 14 724.942.0940 TO ADVERTISE | Woodland Hills members are some of the best family law attorneys in the area and are dedicated to making divorce a healthier, less contentious and less costly experience for our clients. We are seeing more and more couples who have decided to try to divorce in a more respectful and less costly way. I am always happy to offer a consultation at no charge to discuss whether the collaborative process would be best for you. You can obtain information on the CLASP website, www. clasplaw.org, where you will also see the list of specially trained collaborative professionals in this area who are available to assist you. You can learn more about my practice by visiting my website at www.kdschneiderlawoffice.com.