IM 2019 July 19 | Page 38

MINING ENGINES Cat’s recently launched R2900 underground loader is equipped with a six-cylinder, 305 kW- rated C15 engine, which uses the Cat Clean Emissions Module to limit both PM and NOx to near zero These three companies went around their product development in similar fashions to deliver the emission-compliant engines. As Cummins’ Lintereur said: “Stage V in 2019 is the first time our mining products have been impacted by emissions regulations in Europe. Our proven solution for EPA Tier 4 Final using selective catalyst reduction (SCR) allows us to meet Stage V and provide installation consistency for original equipment manufacturers.” Cummins selected SCR for Tier 4 Final and Stage V because it delivers the best balance of installation, efficiency and total cost of ownership (TCO), the company said. The fully integrated after-treatment unit replaces the exhaust muffler, minimising design modifications, while reducing nitrous oxide (NOx) levels to Stage V requirements. The SCR system also features an integrated decomposition chamber and Cummins’ airless dosing system, designed to last the life of the engine. SCR reduces engine backpressure helping increase fuel economy and optimise temperature management, according to Cummins, while minimising Adblue/diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) consumption. Sean Lynas, General Manager of Off-Highway OEM Accounts for Cummins, told IM the use of SCR on the company’s Tier 4 Final engines in high horsepower applications for the US market had worked well, so it made sense to pursue a similar strategy in Europe for Stage V. “Our ambitions for Tier 4 were essentially to be TCO and fluid neutral between US Tier 2 and Tier 4 Final, so the use of SCR wouldn’t be a penalty in any way. I think we have been pretty successful in that,” he said. Lintereur concluded: “Having a common installation for Tier 4 Final/Stage V and 34 International Mining | JULY 2019 unregulated regions, with the exhaust system being the key difference, helps our OEMs build product to use in any territory. They can develop common chassis designs with one engine solution from us to meet the needs of all regions.” Cat, meanwhile, has leveraged a combined Tier 4 Final/Stage V solution across all its large mining truck engines to comply with the respective emission regulations. This has involved accumulating over 100,000 field hours, which included completing a planned engine rebuild. Comparing its US EPA Tier 4 Final engines with its Tier 2 equivalent, Jeff Castleman, Business Development Manager, Large Mining Trucks, told attendees of a November Caterpillar event in Tucson, Arizona, that PM and NOx gas emissions had been reduced by 93% and 62%, respectively. This is thanks to the use of an SCR system using DEF to remove NOx. Castelman said the company went down this route on engines for its large mining trucks as it was a proven emission system with over 20 million hours of field operation, it offered a lower overall fluid and fuel consumption – lowering TCO – had a long life to overhaul (as well as multiple lives), involved common designs and processes, and facilitated ease of service and operation. He went on to show how TCO had fallen on these new engines in a trial comparing a Tier 2- equipped Cat 793F haul truck with a Tier 4 Final- equipped Cat 793F haul truck. Overall, the TCO came down 2.2% in this study, which factored in DEF use, repair and maintenance and diesel use. At the same time as this, the 793F with Tier 4 Final engine maintained its payload performance. The results were similar across the large mining truck range, Castelman added, with those Tier 4 Final field hours coming from 785G trucks working in cold weather climates on coal operations, to 794 ACs running around deep pit copper mines and 797s operating in Canada’s oil sands. When it comes to machines more likely to end up in underground mines, Cat uses a similar approach. In Cat’s more compact range of engines (C3.6- C18 (560 kW and below)), it uses a mix of exhaust gas recirculation and SCR, which also requires diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) aftertreatment and a DEF system, to meet Tier 4 Final/Stage V emission criteria. The exhaust aftertreatment devices are packaged in a Cat Clean Emissions Module (CEM). For example, its recently launched R2900 underground loader, which is equipped with a six-cylinder, 305 kW-rated C15 engine, uses SCR, DOC and a DEF system to limit both PM and NOx to near zero, allowing the machine to meet EU Stage V and Canada’s CANMET standards. MTU, meanwhile, based its Stage V engines on Daimler commercial vehicle engines, with the new limits achieved by internal engine enhancements and adding an SCR system and DPF. Rolls-Royce Power Systems offers a one-box solution featuring SCR, DOC and DPF to integrate all components into the limited installation space of the machines. “This exhaust gas aftertreatment system is both compact and robust,” the company said, adding that the box meets the requirements of vehicle manufacturers and operators by being simple to install, operate and maintain. Fuelling the emission compliance Fuel is a major cost for truck haulage, representing 30-40% of equipment operating costs, according to vertically integrated fuel filtration company Donaldson. As a result, fuel savings of even just a few percentage points can save thousands of dollars per year in even the smallest fleets. At the other end of the scale, if the fleet for a large mining operation uses 1% less fuel, it can mean millions of dollars in annual savings. Tier 4 and Stage V emissions regulations have compelled engine manufacturers to improve the efficiency of their engines, with the challenge being achieving this while also needing to burn more fuel to achieve production levels. Jason DeGuelle, Product Manager – Engine Filtration, Donaldson, said: “Changes to the way engines are built have, in turn, brought changes in the standards for acceptable diesel fuel cleanliness. “High-pressure common rail engines have been designed to improve fuel economy as well as reduce emissions,” he said. “As a result, injectors run at much higher pressures, requiring tighter tolerances and clearances – which is why they need much cleaner fuel to operate at an optimal level.” On major mining sites, unplanned downtime for any reason is a significant problem. “Effective