IM 2018 December 18 | Page 11

EPC & EPCM There are some golden rules when installing incentives and penalties, according to these EPCM contractors: n Include clear objectives with reasonable and attainable goals; n Ensure those carrying the risks are in the best position to control it; n Make sure an open dialogue with a project owners’ team is established and continues throughout. EPCM providers are open to signing contracts that dictate such clauses, but they normally only do so where, again, they have been involved at an early project stage and can dictate the project direction. This is probably why, the big EPC and EPCM contractors are trying to ensure the bulk of project work is carried out in-house. Bechtel’s Wilson said: “We establish the best combination of both external and internal skills in engineering to project needs, as well as the right balance of construction executed by contractors and direct hire construction by Bechtel. “Our data shows that when we control the critical path with our direct hire workforce, applying world-class productivity tools and procedures to reduce costs, we add the most value to our clients by constructing the facilities that represent their revenue stream.” This is all a matter of reducing risk in project execution, according to Christo Visser, Senior Vice President – Origination, for DRA Global. “In delivering comprehensive solutions, the organisation is able to mitigate overall project risk and interface risk between various contractors – this ultimately leads to overall project risk reduction. “Financiers also tend to prefer funding projects backed by larger, more established engineering firms and often shy away from contracts that are divided among smaller, higher risk, less profitable, less financially strong organisations,” Visser said. This ties in neatly with the idea EPC and EPCM providers should be employed in the early stages of a project, a time when having a complete suite of capabilities under one roof is most telling, according to Ausenco’s Douglas. “Being a mine to port provider is most useful in the study phase where clients have a ‘one stop shop’ and a single integrator of the study document – otherwise the client needs to take on this role and the challenge is ensuring there are no gaps at the interface points,” he said. The integration of services also has an impact on the overall cost, DRA Global’s Visser says. “This reduces risk for clients through less interfaces which, in turn, places downward pressure on costs by eliminating margins on various companies and reduces management teams required to assist with the project.” Technology aids Mining companies and contractors have been aided in cost and schedule forecasting with the evolution of technology. The big data, automation and electrification buzz is not just confined to the operational phase of mining, it also has relevance in design and build. Turner & Townsend sees opportunities to influence and design project data with recent technology improvements. “This will focus on the needs of the various stakeholders with a primary focus on: n “Mapping and understanding what data is really needed for all stakeholders at each gateway approval; n “Data sharing single-source data and the ability to append the data sets; n “Timelines of production of the data; n “Defining the data deliverables in all project consultant contracts with associated timing and sequencing to drive project-aligned behaviours.” Bechtel’s Wilson said automation and digitalisation were allowing the company’s innovation initiatives to deliver “tangible” benefits. “On the process innovation side, we are leveraging automation and other process technologies to reduce power and water consumption, and labour requirements in the plants we are designing.”