IM 2016 June 2016 | Page 73

PASTE KOVIT_proof 26/05/2016 12:47 Page 2 Paste Supplement The Escobal mine installation from Kovit has continued to effectively meet the operation’s needs. Final scope for Kovit included the design/supply of the plant and detailed design of the UDS batch mixing is then considered where sensitivity to water or risk of the underground distribution system is more critical. Designing in a box also removes degrees of freedom in a design that results in limitations on size and selection of process equipment. Generally undersized and under-powered, these systems fall down on larger throughput and/or with difficult tailings. Integrated paste backfill and alternative tailings approaches will typically include various arrangements of thickeners, filters (vacuum or pressure filters), conveyors, bins and control systems, though it is important to explore beyond these. Staffing at most consulting, EPCM and vendors has not been sustained or included in-house staff and there may not be a proper succession plan to maintain the knowledge, particularly during low protracted economic cycles. Splitting the work into silos often results in misaligned or different interpretations, and where interpretation by each successive user of “data” leads to a loss in the fidelity of the intent and or knowledge. However, often misplaced trust is placed into designs. Perhaps a modular system is better? Modularity is not new including early examples in the 1800s of homes built offshore and transported to Australia. Easy for control rooms, labs, offices and whole construction accommodations. But heavy industrial equipment configured for a specific need is quite different than for a bed, table or lab bench. Whether modular or custom “stick-built”, a well-designed plant requires specific expertise that includes mineralogy, mineral processing, and materials handling, along with a comprehensive understanding of the operational needs. These plants are not simply for dumpi ng fill down a hole; they not only facilitate but enhance mining processes achieving higher productivity and profitability while tailings as underground fill reduces surface placement. A “one-size fits all” approach suggests that all tailings behave the same and mining needs don’t really change. Standardisation to reduce capital costs has merit, only if the benefits are delivered. The allure of a simple plant-in-a-box is well understood: “just add water.” Manufacture in a low cost country may provide savings. Modular sea containers are simple and easy, so long as the form meets seismicity, in-country codes, road and bridge crossings, etc, HVAC, electrical and control other preferences, and slowly the standardisation is eroded. In a strategy that is based on hire and dehire, most vendors and large engineering firms have shed senior and experienced staff in favour of lower cost junior engineers. Often, this new entourage lacks the depth of operational and design experience and yet does not have the guidance alongside it. Investing and maintaining internal knowledge base and expertise through continuous learning over many successive projects is no longer in favour. Productisation is one way to compete, so long as the site specifics are not lost or betrayed. Sending out sales agents is clearly not the solution, and will not gain the client’s trust in protecting shareholder value. Pressure to ‘sell’ replaces value in listening and validating a solution worthy across a mining project (geology, mining, ore management, mineral processing, concentrate and tailings streams, backfill (tailings, sand/silt resources), environmental site management (footprint, ARD/ML, alternative tailings management) and synergies that backfill incorporates within a holistic site wide strategy. What is in a box The business of standardisation in boxes attempts to contain costs, a key driver for everyone. But standardisation means compromises and may not be realistic within the limited sea container. Will a small 100 t/h mixer be applicable for 200 or 300 t/h, or vice versa. Experience demonstrates that sand or classified tailings mixes easily at 200 t/h in an agitated tank, whereas 75 t/h of pressure filter cake would be impossible. Concrete mixer vendors wrongly assume mixing paste fill is much like concrete. Some tailings are unforgiving, requiring different mixer configurations, greater mixing energy and retention time to obtain a well-mixed and rheologically controlled engineered paste. Designers relying on such vendors having inadequate frames of reference are bound to translate errors into designs. End-users should challenge the promises of a modular plant, like any plant, when there is no choice but to make it work; money isn’t available to start over, especially if production is lost. Modular often compromises both optimisation and robustness – is it value-added? Loss of just one stope per year for a mid-size mine is often worth more than the cost of a backfill plant. On the other hand, a welldesigned system can easily facilitate additional stopes and payback. Plant design – robust and optimised A recent project is a case in point. In 2013, Kovit Engineering was requested by Tahoe Resources Inc to review their modular paste plant and provide detailed engineering of the underground paste distribution system (UDS). Tahoe’s Escobal mine, located in southeast Guatemala is a high-grade silver mine with gold, lead, and zinc. Local conditions include high seismicity, rainfall, small footprint, local farming villages, shared water, and economic, social and political tensions. The tertiary andesite and volcanoclastic host sedimentary formations run over 2 km in strike, and include mud zones requiring novel drifting development methods. Adits and ramps enter the side of a mountain, where the ore extends above and below the surface plants. As a consequence, all cemented paste must be pumped at very high pressure. The modular backfill plant allowed construction to focus on the concentrator and other core facilities. Dry stack tailings storage facility using pressure filters were selected in the sustainable closure solution. Some of the filtered tailings are transported by conveyor to the paste backfill plant approximately  800 m up the valley and 150 m vertical. Mixed with water and cement, the engineered pastefill is pumped to the stopes. Rapid filling is needed to stabilise exposed weak hangingwall rock formations in the 30,000 t bulk stopes. The critical design inputs that closely integrate tailings production and characteristics, materials handling, mixing and control and UDS simply cannot be understated, particularly since paste pumping systems are generally higher JUNE 2016 Supplement | International Mining P13