IIJournals JPM-Special Real Estate Article Collection | Page 5

DC plans implied by the Esrig et al. [2013] results, the segment promises to be an increasingly important one for institutional real estate. Further research into the optimal manner in which to incorporate real estate in a DC world will help to provide direction to the industry regarding this important trend. Even traditional real estate investors such as DB plans continue to face issues in analyzing and managing asset allocation strategy, especially with regard to risk. As already noted, not only are there doubts about the appropriate way to measure return volatility, volatility does not fully describe the risks inherent in a private market asset class such as real estate. Thus, investors continue to face questions as to how best to measure real estate risk, and whether the risk measurement/management tools commonly used for other asset classes within a portfolio can be extended to real estate. Development of risk measurement tools appropriate to real estate but comparable to those used for public market asset classes would be an invaluable service to chief investment officers, as these tools would allow a more holistic examination of risk in a portfolio across all asset classes. (Such tools would also be invaluable to real estate managers, who must discuss real estate risk with chief investment officers more accustomed to dealing with public market assets). Further, because individual real estate assets are relatively large investments, many institutional real estate portfolios are not fully diversified. This means that idiosyncratic risk of individual assets can have a large effect on the risk faced by the investor. Unfortunately, because real estate assets are unique and do not trade continuously, it is virtually impossible to look at the historical volatility of an individual asset. Investors are then left asking questions about real estate risk: What factors drive the returns and the risks of an individual asset? Which of these attributes are diversifiable across real estate assets? Which are diversified within the overall portfolio? How should real estate risk be measured, and how should it be incorporated into a portfolio-wide risk management system? Of course, within other asset classes, common techniques to manage risk exposure depend on derivatives, a market not yet fully developed for real estate. Fabozzi et al. [2013] review the state of the real estate derivatives market, especially in the United Kingdom where the market is most developed, and how to use derivatives to manage real estate price risk. While still in its infancy, the development of a viable and liquid derivatives market would do much to bring modern risk 16 PORTFOLIO STRATEGY AND STRUCTURE TAKE CENTER STAGE JPM-CLAYTON.indd Sec1:16 management techniques within the grasp of real estate portfolio managers. The trend toward new definitions of asset classes potentially complicates some of these questions on optimal real estate allocations. The traditional approach of breaking the world into stocks, bonds, cash, and alternatives, which has held for decades, is beginning to fall out of favor with a growing number of investors. In its place, many investors have now adopted more generally defined asset classes, such as growth, income, and safety, which are characterized according to specific “asset characteristic bundles” or “risk–return buckets” rather than asset type, each of which might include a variety of assets from across the traditionally defined classes. In some cases, investors now use a specific inf lationhedging bucket as an asset class, while other investors use a real assets class, and still others have adopted a private market versus public market breakdown of asset classes. There are many variations on those themes and variations on which real estate assets fall within a class; for instance, real estate may or may not be placed within the inf lation-hedging category, depending how a particular investor views the role of property within the portfolio. In many cases, real estate may fall into more than one asset class, under new definitions. Different real estate assets have different orientations to growth, income, inf lation hedging, and other basic characteristics. It is entirely possible that different types o