IIC Journal of Innovation 9th Edition | Page 46

Trustworthiness Model Representation Business goals ● A Retail store proprietor incorporates smart store analytics to increase profits ● A system integrator provides the system and a Trust Service to the proprietor Core Requirements ● Capture and analyze video and sensor data for store, product marketing ● Detect tampering and theft (of system and merchandise) Key Trustworthiness Characteristics ● Security ● Reliability ● Resilience Attributes ● Camera position ● Camera and sensor reliability ● Application software Table 3: Practical application of Trustworthiness in a Retail Store the analytics data, gives the observer a practical method to evaluate the system and to apply the business model with a measurable degree of confidence. C ONCLUSIONS AND F URTHER W ORK In this paper, we presented a practical approach for a model representation of an IIoT system’s trustworthiness. The Trust Model is designed to flexibly address the varying priorities of different types of IIoT systems to provide the appropriate context for the system. The component and system Trust Scores that are computed by the Model provide an easily interpreted value that enables the model user to take the appropriate actions to maintain the trustworthiness of the system in operation. We have not shared specific details on the Trust Function algorithm or the specific visualization of the model output as these can be vendor-specific and proprietary. In the use cases described above, the data collected is not so unusual or unique in and of itself. However, results of the analytics are only as good as the video or sensor data that is collected. The Trust Score generated by the Trust System tackles the original problem of an unreliable data source. There is ideally a combination of multiple cameras and sensors that provide enough coverage. What if only subsets of the cameras or sensors are operating correctly? What If there is an intermittent connectivity issue with one of the cameras? Either of these conditions will result in a lower Trust Score that is computed from the individual attributes of the system. This results in suboptimal data collection which results in suboptimal data analytics and correlation. The Trust System takes a set of expected and observed attributes that describe the system under observation and computes a Trust Score. The Trust Score, when combined with September 2018 42