IIC Journal of Innovation 7th Edition | Page 30

Outcomes, Insights and Best Practices from IIC Testbeds: MQM Testbed Beijing. It was not until few months later when the testbed team went to the field that they realized their initial plan to improve the welding process was not possible. As mentioned earlier, they came back to the IIC to seek a member with the expertise to assist them in the welding station. During a quarterly testbed update, the MQM Testbed team announced the challenge they were facing and called for assistance. Olympus has expertise in welding equipment. They recommended the testbed team use thermal imaging - an infrared camera on the welding section. The testbed team went back to the lab to try this recommendation. They later found it was not feasible to integrate this infrared camera with the existing robots. are plentiful opportunities for members to jump in to offer guidance and possibly resources to contribute to help moving these testbeds and real-world implementations forward. These recommendations from Olympus and FujiFilm triggered the testbed team to rethink the design and decide where to focus. They helped the team discover that the quality control process was insufficient, thus zeroing in on the element which became the basis for their final solution. All that was needed on the analytics side were some modifications to support the new quality control process. IIoT projects typically involve adoption of a wide range of technologies and practical knowledge from different industries. The brick wall felt by some in a project may not be as hard to overcome for others who have been there and learned from past experiences. Furthermore, although the initial solution offered may not always fit the needs, the support and interests from fellow IIC members can sometimes – as is true for the MQM Testbed – help trigger a different approach, a regrouping and pointing the project in a better direction. The IIC quarterly meetings are a great opportunity to proactively connect with people and expand a project’s resource pool. Another IIC member, FujiFilm, offered a suggestion based upon X-ray film. The testbed team considered the X-ray film idea and weighed the solution which required significantly reconfiguring the welding robots and the solution is designed for post processing so it was not a right fit. Although these recommendations were eventually not incorporated into the testbed design, they showed a great value of the IIC which offers innovators a network of experts with abundant knowledge and technologies in the IoT space. Within this network, there  Return to beginning of this article  Return to Table of Contents IIC Journal of Innovation - 29 -