iGB Affiliate 71 Oct/Nov | Page 45

INSIGHT IF IT AIN’T BROKE... Successful thin affiliates and destination brands need to understand why certain strategies have worked – and it’s probably nothing to do with Google organic search, says Nick Garner. IN BUSINESS THEY SAY you either grow or you die. So as an affiliate you’re probably already thinking about your next move and how you can expand. Following the theme of this month’s issue, I want to look at the big initiatives that sit behind destination affiliate brands and thin affiliate brands. I’m going to examine how these sites work and what the implications are for you and the next steps you take with your affiliate businesses. As a rule of thumb, the less you rely on Google organic-search traffic the better. That’s why big brands work hard to get players into the habit of returning to the same affiliate site. Those players will then jump off into new operators and join them, oifhopefully generating fresh revenue streams for the affiliate brand. If a big, rich affiliate can come up with an effective retention mechanism, that can be good business for them. Sometimes these big initiatives make sense but most of the time for most of the affiliate population, they are a path to trouble. If you get distracted by a big retention project and you stop focusing on profitable traffic, you could lose your rankings and go broke. What is a thin affiliate? Google has a thorough definition of a thin affiliate: “Pages with product affiliate links on which the product descriptions and reviews are copied directly from the original merchant without any original content or added value. Pages of product affiliation “Add up all these thin sites and you’re talking about tens of thousands of them cluttering up the internet” where the majority of the site is made for affiliation and contains a limited amount of original content or added value for users.” Does that sound like ou? In igaming there is a proliferation of review websites that carry ‘same-as’ content and lists of bonuses. A typical webmaster strategy is to create groups of sites, each slightly different from the other, in the hope that a couple of them will rank well. Add up all these thin sites and you’re talking about tens of thousands of them cluttering up the internet. If thin affiliate sites are so awful, then, why do they rank? I believe that, when it comes to organic search results, Google ranks sites in order of popularity for a given key phrase within a given country territory. So when you look for comparison phrases on bonuses or free bets (players know that one operator is much like another and if there is ‘free money’ being given away, they want some of it), these thin affiliate websites proliferate. iGB Affiliate Issue 71 OCT/NOV 2018 43