iDentistry The Journal Volume 14 No.1 | Page 45

The Journal j Treatment Related [Mechanical] Factors ½ Type of orthodontic appliances used ½ Magnitude of applied forces ½ Direction of tooth movement ½ Amount of tooth movement ½ Jiggling and Occlusal trauma j Combined Factors ½ Treatment duration ½ Root resorption detected radiographically during orthodontic treatment ½ Root resorption after appliance removal ½ Relapse Types of appliance used Magnets Degree of root damage is a function of the appliance used. Increase in force as space closes with time (attraction) can stimulate a more physiologic tissue response, thus decrease the potential for root resorption. Fixed versus Removable Use of fixed appliances is more detrimental to the roots. Ketcham found that normal function is disturbed by splinting effect of fixed appliances over a long period that can cause root resorption. Stuteville concluded in his study that jiggling forces caused by removable appliances are more harmful to roots.12 Begg versus Edgewise Light wire Begg technique causes less root resorption than edgewise. Maxillary incisor root resorption during the Begg stages has been documented. Malmgren et al. suggested that there is no difference between these techniques and also found that frequency of root resorption was signficantly higher (48%) in traumatized maxillary incisors when intruded by the Begg technique compared with edgewise technique (43%).3 44 Rapid Maxillary Expansion External root structure of 13 and appliance- attached and 5 unattached maxillary first premolars from 9 patients have been investigated with the scanning electron microscope (SEM). • All anchor premolars exhibited root resorption (mostly confined to buccal surface). • Longer an anchor tooth remained in fixed retention, more extensive the buccal root resorption. • In contrast, Timms and Moss, in a light microscopic study of RME-induced root resorption, found that resorption bays were confined to the mesiobuccal and distobuccal root surfaces of anchor teeth; buccal root surfaces were specifically excluded as sites of resorption.9 Vol. 14 No. 1 Jan-Apr 2018