IDENTIDADES 1 ENGLISH IDENTIDADES 9 ENGLISH | Page 71

deaf and look other way when I ask for doing something about it." Up to now, something is hold that seems absent: the African culture is relegated as absolutely irrelevant in Argentina. The very rulers fail to articulate a coherent inclusive proposal and undertake isolated actions with little or no impact and social benefit. They hardly go beyond the good intentions or innocuous acts. In the second arrest of Adriana Izquierdo and his sister Graciela, their Afro phenotype was enough to abduct them before the arrival of tourists for the Soccer World Cup: the city should look as much as possible as European. The old ideals of the nineteenth century white republic were revived. Adriana concluded that "the color weighed heavily on the dictatorship and therefore, it was really at that time that they wanted to conceal our African history and say that we do not exist in Argentina." In this line, you can subtly read the biological / cultural affiliation of the victims to their immediate action before or after suffering the state violence. From the hermeneutical perspective, such a violence may have been experienced as sensory and emotional revival of the ancient pain inflicted to their ancestors, who were also detained-disappeared persons from both Africa and History. Among the first documented expressions by Afro-Argentinean is their recognition as being "the first disappeared persons in history." One of the interviewees said that their ancestors had been "kidnapped from Africa." The terms disappearance and abduction carry a burden of excessive violence, especially since the very existence of the witness herself proved the inaccuracy. Then, her human corporeality moved in time and space coordinates to the before-and-after hinge of her existence: "I was really kidnapped from Africa." Thus, the harshness of human trafficking was revealed in the victim’s perspective and this motivated me to study the subject against the official historiography. I needed the voice and skin, the pain of life and death narrated from the sensorial and vital experience. And of course, from the music, so essential in the relevant ethos. Orfilia Montero did not express it directly, but I believe I have understood it well. The extreme experience of being kidnapped, handcuffed, blindfolded and surrounded by weapons and odd, alien and aggressive voices, recalled in her corporeality that experience of their ancestors, who were loaded onto slave ships on a one-way trip without knowing why or what for or where to. At this point of the anthropology, we can disregard positivism. I saw her eyes shining of absence and her nervous hands, and felt how her words were increasingly turning into whispers fearing the old ears that had given her and hers away. Perhaps she filled so the void that would occupy the face of her daughter Mirta, who was never found. I even bother to classify that performance as interview and prefer to understood it as a conversation in a very special moment as part of a friendship cultivated for years. It was difficult to me to get an idea of what she was expressing, and much harder for her to verbalize such extreme experience, which went beyond herself to the disappearance of a daughter. She never got tired of waiting for her daughter. And thusly Orfilia left this world. If the abductions and disappearances caused by the Argentinean military can be compared to those in Africa from the sixteenth to the nineteenth century, the forced labor by many detainees is another bridge of shared sense, as Ramón Camilo Juárez stated with regard to the case of his mother, Alicia País, during her captivity in ESMA: "Here, the day of this meeting of African descent, we commented about the chains herein, the shackles worn on the feet, and about how that ancestrally caused in their bodies a sense of empathy with the pain of the disappeared detainees [ ...]. Some of the survivals here spent several years doing slave labor, because they were shackled, enclosed within walls, in a space of 1 meter 70 centimeters. And they were brought to work 8 hours without any wage, doing slave labor and returning to that place with one meal a day [...]. Herein they were also just a number." This a profound comment because, as it happens in oral history, the testimonies include not only events to be narrated, but also their conceptual development, the interpretations that they may have had according to the narrator who lived the 70