IDENTIDADES 1 ENGLISH IDENTIDADES 7 ENGLISH | Page 123
change could ask the factual question
about the science of climate change and
an attitudinal question about one’s concerns about climate change. This could
be framed as T/F (average temperatures
have increased in post-industrial times)
or along the lines of feelings or attitudes
(“How important is this issue for you?”-“Important, Somewhat Important, Not
Important”) or a Likert Scale (Given the
following statement, “We should do
something about Climate Change” do
you “agree, disagree, etc.”) Surveys can
be given prior to an event (a pre-survey)
or after an event (post-survey). Surveys
given both prior to and after an event can
yield interesting statistical information
about changes in knowledge and attitude
and can lead to important research into
the effects of the deliberative process. In
many instances, however, well-designed
post-surveys can be just as useful for
policy makers if their interest is tied to
more typical types of public input like
those of ‘town hall meetings.’ In 2014
we worked with the City of Pittsburgh in
the pubic comment phase for the selection process for a new Chief of Police.
The City had already developed a set of
selection criteria that they wanted to see
in the new police chief (Integrity, Ability
to Work with the Community, etc.). Beyond that, they were interested in hearing what the community expected from
their new police chief and how the
community was willing to work with the
new police chief. We designed the survey to measure quantitative community
input on the selection criteria and qualitative input on the community expectations. For the quantitative input, we used
a model of ‘range voting’ where people
are free to select one option several
times. As opposed to ‘preference ordering’ (which requires one to mark preferences in order – first, second, third, etc.),
range voting allows one to give as many
options as one wants to same ordering
(e.g., ‘important’). The quantitative
forms allowed the City to gain quick
validation and legitimization of criteria
already developed (as well as to raise red
flags). A comments section also provided input for the reasons for one’s selection.
Please check the box that best reflects your
Important
opinion on the following search criteria:
Somewhat
Important
Not Important
Personal and Professional Integrity
13
0
Experience working successfully with diverse
225
communities and populations
7
0
Experience employing evidence-based strategies of community collaboration and law en- 172
forcement
43
2
217
123