IDENTIDADES 1 ENGLISH IDENTIDADES 5 ENGLISH | Page 154
any good if he goes out of his way to makes
his country’s internal situation worse
through things like lack of supplies and
food, corruption, the corrosion of democracy, inflation, political persecution, militarization, State repression, among others.
who at specific moments of history have
victimized their respective peoples after
having sown false hopes through political
projects promoting change and renovation.
The current situation in the Americas is
inviting to dialogue; we should start out by
understanding that the most simple investment any citizen can contribute to construct, reinforce or renovate a democracy is
to talk with others, ask questions and
acknowledge that their criteria and opinions
are important. Dialoguing implies a challenge; to break with the irrefutable belief
that there is only one truth or solution. It
also inspires a search for a new understanding based on mutual comprehension, shared
values and confidence in the others.
It is important to highlight the dynamism
between the elements of dialogue at play
here when reflecting on the situations proposed. Understanding them can be fruitful
for the Latin American community, in general.
In first place, one can infer that anyone who
enters into a dialogical relationship is motivated by a will to participate and achieve
agreement, even if he or she lacks the linguistic competence to express ideas. He or
she can still benefit from the consensus
achieved. It is even probable that the mere
fact of participating in the dialogue can help
the individual or group slowly improve
their capacity to express themselves and
start of offer ideas in support of the proposal.
The countries of the Americas are going
through a historic moment; for societies to
participate in their transformation should be
more than a responsibility. It should be an
obligation to reconcile our differences and
always resort to dialogue and reflection as
our best option.
On the other hand, one might consider that
anyone who enters a dialogical relationship
solely because of his or her linguistic competence but lacks the will to participate and
only wants to beat out his or her counterpart. That renders impossible any agreement, that is: this participant is stuck on his
or her ideas and is trying to disqualify or
discredit the interlocutor. Dialogue cancels
out under these conditions; this reflects the
attitude of some Latin American leaders
154