IDEA November 2013 | Page 6

Does Science Give us

Many individuals hold the opinion that scientific discoveries and theories give us truth about the world around us. It is also suggested that the scientific method is a valid source of knowledge, which leads to truth. In the past, scientific research and discoveries have been responsible for the incredible advances in technology, from cures for diseases, to computers, to space travel. Yet we must ask ourselves the question: Are these technological advancements evidence of truth in the world? To inquire about this important philosophical question, it is important to consider three major views regarding truth in science.

The first of these views is called the instrumentalist view, a view that is similar to the pragmatic view of truth. Instrumentalists claim that a scientific theory or idea is true if it works, and whether the theory works or not determines if it is acceptable. This view goes further to say that when a scientific theory works, it is acceptable if it allows accurate predictions to be made about observations and experiments (similar to practical consequences in pragmatism). Instead of discovering theories, instrumentalists invent them based on pure assumption, then use their theories to make accurate predictions about the outcome of experiments. For example, if an instrumentalist assumes that electrons exist, he/she can create predictions about the way chemical bonds work. However, the instrumentalist would then say that electrons do not literally exist. They are only assumed to exist because their assumed existence contributes to accurate scientific predictions about the world, and satisfies human needs.

TRUTH?

By Darian Brandolino