nichannel offering
performance to equal importance in a mutually beneficial relationship . ry high tax tzerland more or e tax rates online , so ake sense ft revenue annel to
EM ,
-based play at all
eople were e business was ere too many eals Bliem . total amount nline was less than he online did not uction in the offline . stomer group , and the link ng is not big .” ttemerides see ance as inherently look , which seems ive for both d-based and online
Online play can support a landbased counterpart . But it ’ s a complex relationship . Omnichannel offerings have the ability to bring in more customers by leveraging traditionally land-based offerings , and most crucially , allow operators to increase share of wallet .
“ Some customers only want to play online , which is fine ,” Pettemerides says . “ Some customers will only want to play in a venue , but your most valuable customers will want to do both .”
Again , the importance of not making one subsidiary superior to the other comes up . For his part , Bliem says channels must work together to bring forward the most valuable forms of engagement .
“ What we see as popular in Switzerland is live casino operation being broadcast from land-based ,” he says . “ Our customers can play offline in the casino , and can play on the same table online .”
It comes down to whether operators are willing to merge land-based and online channels where possible . According to Pettemerides and Bliem , customers seem keener to engage with offerings that are familiar to them , rather than dazzling new services . Simply put , this is how operators can ensure a balanced relationship between online and land-based play , as opposed to one channel inherently supporting the other .
July 2021