IB Prized Writing Sevenoaks School IB Prized Writing 2014 | Page 209

Emma Rixhon - Philosophy To what extent are acts of individual rebellion necessary for social progress? are the only ones who can inform the herd-people of the inadequacies of society, and bring about a positive revolution. However, Mill emphasizes that there are few persons whose experiments would be improvements on society; there are therefore a whole other number of individuals whose views would result in social regression, or possibly stagnation. The actions of these key individuals are not focused on however, and it is the presence of their original ideas which Mill admires. However the importance of individuals is not only reserved to those with originality. As Mill believes society should primarily be viewed as an entity made up of humans acting as individual  building  blocks,  it  follows  that  “when  there  is   more  life  in  the  units  there  is  more  in  the  mass  which  is  composed  of  them.” 7 This means that each person must flourish in order to bring about a greater flourishing to their society. The threat however  is  that  “individuals  are  lost  in  the   crowd” 8 and  that  society  enforces  so  much  emphasis  on  the  majority’s  view  that   individual people and minorities become insignificant. The majority is viewed as “the  public”  and  their  opinion  is  frequently  considered the right one. By bestowing power on to the greatest number of agreeing individuals, we are simply giving the power to the people who fit into the current mould of society. These people who fit simply into the mould cannot therefore be the geniuses and original  individuals  who  inspire  social  progress,  and  are  simply  a  “collective   mediocrity.” 9 This  ties  in  to  Nietzsche’s  ideas  as  the  philosopher  named  all   followers  of  society  “herd-men” 10 ; just as sheep are in herds, humans flock together when they blindly  follow  their  society.  His  choice  of  the  word  “herd”   also implies that the non-individual members of society have a level of consciousness closer to animals than the individuals. Nietzsche also writes that “the herd-man in Europe today makes himself out to be the only permissible kind of man” 11 saying that these herd-men admire peaceful, calm, and agreeable people rather than those who outwardly rebel. There is a direct correlation with ibid. p72 ibid. p75 9 ibid. p75 10 Tanner, M. 2000 p40 11 Tanner, M. 2000 p40 7 8 208 5