IB Prized Writing Sevenoaks School IB Prized Writing 2014 | Page 40

Robert Cinca - Physics I then worked out the net energy flow into the wire: This lead to me finding out the temperature increase after each time increment, equation: , where is the I using then the worked out the net energy flow into the mass wire: of the filament (as worked out 10 I earlier) then worked out the net energy into of the Tungsten wire: . and is the specific heat flow capacity This lead to me finding out the temperature increase after each time increment, This lead to me finding out the temperature each time , where is the increase mass of after the filament (as increment, worked out using the out equation: To work the current at each time increment, I just used the equation: 10 using the equation: , where is the mass of the filament (as worked out earlier) and is the specific heat capacity of Tungsten . 10 I earlier) continued until heat I reached a final steady current (please see Figure 15 . and this is process the specific capacity of Tungsten To out the of current at each time increment, I just used the equation: for work appearance the model). To work out the current at each time increment, I just used the equation: I continued this process until I reached a final steady current (please see Figure 15 I continued this process until I reached a final steady current (please see Figure 15 for appearance of the model). for appearance of the model). Figure 15: Hot Body Radiator Model Excel Model Results Figure 15: Hot Body Radiator Model Figure 15: Hot Body Radiator Model Running the excel model with various final currents, adjusted by altering the potential divider Model resistance, yielded a proportional relationship between surge current time Excel Results and the inverse square of the final steady current. The equation of the trend line that Excel Model Results Running the excel model with final currents, ΔT = (7.3 ± 2.1) I -2 + (15 adjusted ± 37). by altering the potential has resulted from the graph is: various Running the excel model various final relationship currents, adjusted altering the potential divider resistance, yielded with a proportional between by surge current time divider yielded a proportional time that and the resistance, inverse square of the final steady relationship current. The between equation surge of the current trend line -2 and resulted the inverse square of the is: final of the trend line that has from the graph ΔT = steady (7.3 ± current. 2.1) I + The (15 ± equation 37). -2 has resulted from the graph is: ΔT = (7.3 ± 2.1) I + (15 ± 37). 10” Metals-Specific Heats”, The Engineering Toolbox [Online][Date Accessed 14/07/13] URL: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-metals-d_152.html (The Engineering Toolbox) 10” Metals-Specific Heats”, The Engineering Toolbox 39 [Online][Date Accessed 14/07/13] URL: 10” http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-metals-d_152.html (The Engineering Toolbox) Metals-Specific Heats”, The Engineering Toolbox [Online][Date Accessed 14/07/13] URL: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-metals-d_152.html (The Engineering Toolbox) 21