IAMAQ Magazine 3/2020
similar ways; a low correlation would mean they go in different directions [6].
McKelvey observed that social entanglement ties are inherently unstable and deteriorate toward weak or strong ties over time. Strong ties occur typically when people meet at least once or twice a week; weak ties when they meet a few times year. Bridges across social groups are important because ties between existing cliques can help to bridge differences between functionally specialized 'silos' in firms. This concept of a social entanglement is analogous to Granovetter’s 'strength of weak ties' finding that innovation and novelty tends to come from weak ties, as strong ties generally favors the status quo and are therefore not as adaptively efficient as emergence from weak ties [7].
The majority of research in entrepreneurship [8], marketing [9] and economics [10] have had their metatheoretical assumptions in the functionalist camp (i.e., positivist or postpositivist perspective). Similarly, “the bulk of International Entrepreneurship (IE) research captures data in a logical positivist manner, emphasizing inferential statistics, hypothesis testing, and so on” [11].
These paradigms have not been without success, else, they would not have commanded loyalty for so long [12]; however, in the context of international entrepreneurship research, this monoculture can be considered a weakness [13].
A quantum computer could perform some tasks, such as database searches, trillions and trillions of times faster than conventional computers can. James D. Miller guess that a practical quantum computer would be one of the most beneficially disruptive forces to ever hit an economy.
A quantum computer would only be able to work on a limited class of problems. But once a quantum computer was developed, entrepreneurs would enthusiastically seek to find practical uses for it. Google poses the greatest threat to Microsoft. Miller suspects that some Microsoft executives dream about having a quantum computer that is so good at database searches that it drives Google to technological oblivion [14].
In our definition Human Quantum Biocatalysts (HQB) are human beings able to catalyze human relationships through quantum entanglement (here we intend quantum entanglement of three tubulin qubits of three different brains) [15].
Consider Max, Paola and Eliano (P and E replace the usual quantum couple Alice and Bob) M is the HQB: the commutative diagram of the classical case becomes the associative property of the connective entanglement [@ ]
(QP @ QE) @ QM = QP @ (QE @ QM)
This property cannot be demonstrated in Basic Logic [16] because the third qubit QM plays the role of a context on the right , then in this case Basic Logic must be extended to Basic Logic plus context on the right (BR). The right connective [@ ] has a symmetric, the left connective [ § ] for which the associative property requires a context on the left. In this case we should consider Basic Logic plus context on the left (BL), the maximally entangled state of three qubits being the GHZ state: (I000> + I111>) [17].