A WARRIOR’S
MORAL DILEMMA
PREIOUS PAGE: VICTORIA WILL
BY DAVID WOOD
I HAVE COVERED conflict and the military for 35 years, drawn to the adventure and adrenaline rush,
and fascinated by the drama of Americans at war. I feel privileged to have been accepted by soldiers
and Marines in their squads, platoons and battalions. Living with the grunts, I have come to respect
their grit, their sense of honor and commitment, their bearing, their courage. I’ve been enriched by
their unfailing humor and spontaneous generosity. Amid the horror and squalid waste of war, I have
seen young Americans at their best. In a very personal way, I honor their service.
It took me a long time to recognize that something was wrong. I know too many accomplished
warriors who return home proud but uneasy about their experiences. Some have sought therapy,
but most have not. Some were diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Most were not.
But they are not okay.
This series came from a determination to understand why, and to explore how their way back
from war can be smoothed. Moral injury is a relatively new concept that seems to describe what
many feel: a sense that their fundamental understanding of right and wrong has been violated, and
the grief, numbness or guilt that often ensues.
Here, you will meet combat veterans struggling with the moral and ethical ambiguities of war.
You will hear from some of the researchers and therapists working to help them cope, and you
will come to understand some of the demons that veterans bring home from battle. However we
individually feel about the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, these enduring moral wounds, to
young Americans who fought on our behalf, must be counted among the ultimate costs.
MOR A L IN J URY >> PART I