Huffington Magazine Issue 85 | Page 60

ALASKA IS FLAGGING “It’s not ‘Oh, jeez, here he goes again with another rant.’ They know I’m serious.” THE SPECTER OF ‘FOR SALE’ SIGNS If Ted Stevens was most responsible for building today’s Alaska, it may be up to Mark Begich to keep it from falling apart. Alaska’s economy has fared well during Begich’s term in the Senate, and his work on the 2009 stimulus package quickly established him as a viable successor to Stevens in the role of the state’s chief appropriator. Per capita, Alaska benefited more from the Recovery Act than any other state. Now, as Begich travels around the state with an eye toward his reelection campaign, he is quick to point out his rapid ascension in Senate seniority and his seat on the Appropriations Committee. Still, he’s faced with a far more tightfisted Congress than his predecessors were, and a state economy that is flirting with catastrophe. Washington spending and the oil industry are responsible for a combined two-thirds of Alaska’s economy and jobs, and in some communities 71 percent of personal income derives from government funding. A dramatic HUFFINGTON 01.26.14 change in the status quo could be disastrous, transforming Alaska from one of the country’s most economically crucial states — one where each resident receives an annual dividend check from the state’s oil revenue — to something amounting to a glorified territory. Gregg Erickson, an economist who has worked extensively “At the end of the day, Alaskans are worried about what the economy is doing. Will they still have a job, is the military going to be here, is the oil and gas flowing?” on state issues, predicted that Alaska’s declining fortunes could cause an economic downturn that would eclipse the one visited upon Michigan after the auto industry’s collapse. “The specter of ‘For Sale’ signs looms large,” Erickson told HuffPost. “Think Appalachia with seven months of winter,” Alaska-based journalists Amanda Coyne and Tony Hopfinger wrote, rather bluntly, in their book Crude Awakening. With earmarks, it was easier for lawmakers to address specific con-