Huffington Magazine Issue 43 | Page 63

DIVIDE OR CONQUER He claimed that the Maryland law violated not only his client’s Second Amendment rights, but also the rights of everyone who had ever been rendered ineligible to own a firearm because of a common-law misdemeanor. The D.C. Circuit rejected Gura’s argument, and the judge writing the opinion issued a scathing decision in which he said that if Gura had simply focused on reinstating his client’s gun rights, they would likely have agreed with him. “It’s the luck of the draw in the judges,” said Gottlieb, adding, “That’s true in a lot of these cases. But I think the ruling is stupid, and I’m 100 percent confident we’re going to win [in the end]. In fact, that’s going to be one of our easier wins.” The SAF is also being more aggressive than the NRA about which cases it takes on. As of midFebruary, the SAF was a party to at least 18 gun rights cases pending in trial and appellate courts, while the NRA was a party in just nine open cases. This is remarkable, considering that the SAF’s total operating budget was $4 million in 2010 (the most recent year for which figures are available), an amount that pales in HUFFINGTON 04.07.13 comparison to the NRA’s $243 million budget that year. Gottlieb insisted the SAF has the resources it needs to fight this many cases and said the group reinvests any legal fees it wins into more litigation. “Right now, we have about 10 attorneys working on our cases, and we’re paying them all,” he said. But according to professor Winkler, “there’s an element of SAF’s strategy that’s ‘spaghetti on the wall,’ in that they’re filing too “THEY’VE SAID YOU CAN HAVE A GUN, AND YOU CAN HAVE A GUN IN YOUR HOME, SO THE LOGICAL NEXT STEP IS TO SEE WHERE ELSE YOU CAN HAVE ONE.” many lawsuits, and in a lot of these cases they’re getting bad results.” The SAF’s blueprint for litigation is “overly aggressive and potentially reckless,” said Klukowski, the former NRA staffer who emphasized that he does not speak on behalf of the NRA. In the long run, he said, “the SAF endangers the Second Amendment by going out on a limb and going into tangents and overdriving its headlights.”