Huffington Magazine Issue 39 | Page 67

“We didn’t want extreme things. We wanted, like, health care. Normal basics.” BREAD LINE management was squeezing workers, adding to their workload while simultaneously cutting hours. Some management practices were “arbitrary and abusive,” Wood claimed. One such practice was known as “splits.” Bakers were often required to work at two different cafes on the same day, but they weren’t paid for the time they spent traveling between cafes or reimbursed for the miles they put on their own cars — a not-insignificant cost for someone earning $10 an hour. Saber’s company, Bread of Life, bought the cafes in August 2011 and brought in new management, but the pro-union bakers say their problems continued. Bringing some old-school unionism to the new world of fast-casual eateries, the workers sought out the 127-year-old Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union as their representative. “These are bakers just like I was a baker,” said John Price, an international representative for the union, which recently gained national attention for its strike against Hostess shortly before the Twinkie-maker’s liquidation. Eventually, 90 percent of the Panera bakers signed cards authorizing a union election. But according to a complaint filed last year by a regional director for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the federal agency that enforces labor law, Bread of Life managers allegedly violated labor law in trying to dissuade workers from joining the union. Saber was personally responsible for many of the violations, the complaint stated. Bread of Life has since settled the complaint without admitting any wrongdoing. Among the allegations in the complaint, in the weeks leading up to the election Bread of Life told employees not to sign union authorization cards; asked employees who’d signed them to retract them; launched a website designed “to discourage support” for the union; promised workers better employee benefits if they declined to unionize; and threatened employees with “loss of benefits” if they did unionize. The effort also included at least two required meetings with man- HUFFINGTON 03.10.13