Huffington Magazine Issue 26 | Page 56

HUFFINGTON 12.09.12 OUT AT THE TIMES ner. Later, a couple of the gay individuals who had been present privately told Gwertzman what they thought of his comment. But more significant, in what some say was a first, Frankel and Lelyveld took Gwertzman to task, letting him know that from then on gay slurs would not be tolerated at The New York Times. “They came down on him hard — tore him out a new asshole,” quips Times deputy news editor Russell King, who is gay. Several months later, Philip Gefter, who’d just been hired as a Times picture editor, was sitting at the picture desk when he overheard a straight male editor retelling an event to a group of people. In his account, the male editor said the word “fruits” to describe gay men. A straight female editor who was present became incensed. She told the male editor his words were hurtful. Gefter, empowered by the woman, reeled around, looked the male editor in he face, and said, ‘’Yeah. You never know when there might be a gay person around.” The male editor mumbled an apology and loped off. In January, two weeks after becoming the new Times publisher, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. held a meeting with the editorial staff in the newsroom. It was a new year and a new Times. He told the staff that from then on “diversity” would be a priority at the paper, and eventually he blurted out the phrase “sexual orientation.” “We almost fell off our chairs,” recalls photographer Sara Krulwich, a lesbian who’s been with The Times for 13 years. “It was the first time any top executive at The Times had ever used those words.” And just a few weeks ago, in an unprecedented appearance, Lely- veld spoke to the newly formed National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association at New York’s Gay and Lesbian Community Services Center. He gave several reasons for appearing before the crowd of 250, including his desire “to show solidarity with my gay colleagues at The Times.” While what some have dubbed the Lavender Enlightenment was occurring behind the scenes at The Times in the last year or so, it seemed like all manner of gay and lesbian news was suddenly fit to print on the paper’s pages as well. There were stories about suburban gays, Jewish gays in search of a rabbi, powerful lesbians in the gay and lesbian civil rights movement, the paucity of gay and lesbian characters on television and even a travel piece — with recommendations from a New York hotel concierge — on things for gay couples from Los Angeles to do while visiting