Huffington Magazine Issue 22 | Page 103

Exit unfaithful in its own way.” Wright’s Anna stars Keira Knightley in the titular role: a highsociety woman who leaves behind her beloved nine-year-old child and unloved husband (a well-cast Jude Law) for a younger man, Count Vronsky (a miscast Aaron TaylorJohnson). It marks Wright’s third collaboration with Knightley, beginning with 2005’s refreshingly wellpaced Pride & Prejudice. Knightley looks the part as Anna—dark mess of curls, flickering eyes and elusive charm—but feels more an approximation of her. The more revelatory performances come from the supporting cast. Matthew MacFayden, who played Darcy to Knightley’s Elizabeth in Pride & Prejudice, delights as her gregarious brother, Oblonsky. And Wright’s inclusion of Levin and Kitty—the novel’s secondary love story, oft-overlooked in film—elicits two of the film’s most genuine character interpretations. One of Wright’s more astute choices was in not casting Anna and Vronsky’s story as one of epic love, as it has been in previous tellings. Tolstoy’s novel is realistic fiction, and his lovers—stuck in a lustful, unhealthy codependency— suffer for it. The problem, then, comes in Wright’s surface treat- FILM HUFFINGTON 11.11.12 ment of their relationship. With little explanation of how Anna’s life regresses with Vronsky—as he maintains his social cachet, and she is increasingly ostracized—the cause of her slide into depression is hopelessly confused. As Tolstoy reminds us often in Anna, even so-called surface issues—lust, jealousy, selfishness— have depth. Wright is keenly aware of this. “... The tradition of realism Every movie adaptation of Anna Karenina is unfaithful in its own way.” is too obsessed with the surface of things, and what I find so engaging in Tolstoy’s novels are the twists and turns in the landscape of the characters’ minds,” he told the New York Times. “I wanted to find a form of expression that was more capable of conveying that sort of experience.” But Wright’s interpretation feels more like an earnest attempt to justify remaking a film that’s been done at least 11 times before him. The result is an Anna you must follow mindlessly, without understanding anything.