How to Coach Yourself and Others How to Influence, Persuade and Motivate | Page 216
When we come in contact with someone of the opposite sex, the
attractiveness concept is magnified. Attractive females can persuade men
more easily than unattractive ones, and attractive males can persuade
females more easily than unattractive males can. We see obvious
examples of this all around us. At conventions and trade shows, large
corporations fill their space with sexy and attractive females. In one study,
men who saw a new car ad that included a seductive female model rated
the car as faster, more appealing, more expensive looking, and better
designed than did men who viewed the same ad without the model.[5]
Additionally, female students who are perceived to be more attractive by
their professors often receive substantially higher grades than unattractive
females. It is not uncommon for a store manager to assign an attractive
female sales associate to the young man who walks in the door. Most
store managers (although they won't admit it) hire attractive salespeople to
attract more customers.
Research has shown that looks matter outside of advertising as well. In
various studies, attractive men and women, when compared to those who
were considered to be less attractive, were judged to be happier, smarter,
friendlier, and more likable. They were also considered likely to have
better jobs, be better marital partners, or to get more dates. The halo effect
causes us to see such people only in a positive way, which gives them
persuasive power. Because of the way we view them, we want to be like
them and we hope for them to like us in return.[6]
The attractiveness of our clothes can also evoke the Rule of Connectivity.
Researchers Freed, Chandler, Mouton, and Blake conducted a nowfamous experiment on how easy it would be to encourage people to ignore
a "Don't Walk" sign at a city intersection. When a well-dressed individual
ignored the sign and walked into the street, 14 percent of the people who
had been waiting for the light to change followed him across. When the
same person repeated the experiment the next day, now dressed in sloppy
clothes, only 4 percent of the people followed him across. A similar effect
has been found in hiring situations. In one study, the good grooming of
applicants in a simulated employment interview accounted for more
favorable hiring decisions than did their job qualifications. This happened
even though the interviewers claimed that appearance only played a minor
role in their choices.[7]
216