How to Coach Yourself and Others Empowering Coaching And Crisis Interventions | Page 188
This book is in B&W, not color - Print page in Grayscale for Correct view!
strategies did you employ to obtain staff or administrative buy-in? What other obstacles have you
identified if the screening is implemented? Have you developed strategies to target their specific
obstacles?
Do you have a system in place to manage the results of the screening and assessment process?
Note: While formal assessment tools are consistently used in research associated with substance use disorders,
treatment providers and counselors are less likely to use formalized tools and more likely to only use clinical
interviews (Allen 1991). The standardization of formal assessment measures offers consistency and uniformity
in administration and scoring. If the implementation of these tools is not cost prohibitive and staff maintain
adherence to administration guidelines, formal assessment tools can be easily adopted regardless of diverse
experience, training, and treatment philosophy among clinicians. Using psychometrically sound instruments can
offset clinical bias and provide more credibility with clients.
The focus of the assessment may vary depending on the program and the specific issues of an individual client.
A structured biopsychosocial history interview can be obtained by using The Psychosocial History (PSH)
assessment tool (Comfort et al. 1996), a comprehensive multidisciplinary interview incorporating modifications
of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) designed to assess the history and needs of women in substance abuse
treatment. Investigators have sought to retain the fundamental structure of ASI while expanding it to include
family history and relationships, relationships with partners, responsibilities for children, pregnancy history,
history of violence and victimization, legal issues, and housing arra