How to Coach Yourself and Others Coaching Families | Page 28

part, as a pragmatic alternative form of intervention - especially as an adjunct to the treatment of serious mental
disorders with a significant biological basis, such as schizophrenia - and represented something of a conceptual
challenge to some of the "systemic" (and thus potentially "family-blaming") paradigms of pathogenesis that
were implicit in many of the dominant models of family therapy. The late-1960s and early-1970s saw the
development of network therapy (which bears some resemblance to traditional practices such as Ho'oponopono)
by Ross Speck and Carolyn Attneave, and the emergence of behavioural marital therapy (renamed behavioural
couples therapy in the 1990s; see also relationship counselling) and behavioural family therapy as models in
their own right.
By the late-1970s the weight of clinical experience - especially in relation to the treatment of serious mental
disorders - had led to some revision of a number of the original models and a moderation of some of the earlier
stridency and theoretical purism. There were the beginnings of a general softening of the strict demarcations
between schools, with moves toward rapprochement, integration, and eclecticism – although there was,
nevertheless, some hardening of positions within some schools. These trends were reflected in and influenced
by lively debates within the field and critiques from various sources, including feminism and post-modernism,
that reflected in part the cultural and political tenor of the times, and which foreshadowed the emergence (in the
1980s and 1990s) of the various "post-systems" constructivist and social constructionist approaches. While there
was still debate within the field about whether, or to what degree, the systemic-constructivist and medicalbiological paradigms were necessarily antithetical to each other (see also Anti-psychiatry; Bio psychosocial
model), there was a growing willingness and tendency on the part of family therapists to work in multi-modal
clinical partnerships with other members of the helping and medical professions.
From the mid-1980s to the present the field has been marked by a diversity of approaches that partly reflect the
original schools, but which also draw on other theories and methods from individual psychotherapy and
elsewhere – these approaches and sources include: brief therapy, structural therapy, constructivist approaches
(e.g., Milan systems, post-Milan/collaborative/conversational, reflective), solution-focused therapy, narrative
therapy, a range of cognitive and behavioural approaches, psychodynamic and object relations approaches,
attachment and Emotionally Focused Therapy, intergenerational approaches, network therapy, and multi
systemic therapy (MST). Multicultural, intercultural, and integrative approaches are being developed. Many
practitioners claim to be "eclectic," using techniques from several areas, depending upon their own inclinations
and/or the needs of the client(s), and there is a growing movement toward a single “generic” family therapy that
seeks to incorporate the best of the accumulated knowledge in the field and which can be adapted to many
different contexts; however, there are still a significant number of therapists who adhere more or less strictly to
a particular, or limited number of, approach(es).
Ideas and methods from family therapy have been influential in psychotherapy generally: a survey of over 2,500
US therapists in 2006 revealed that of the ten most influential therapists of the previous quarter-century, three
were prominent family therapists, and the marital and family systems model was the second most utilized model
after cognitive behavioural therapy.
As we move through the 21st century, the internet is fostering the growth of online programs that make courses
and programs in family therapy more widely accessible. Using mass media techniques to increase public
understanding of issues in family therapy has added a new frontier for amplification in the future.

28