Hooo-Hooo Hooo-Hooo Vol. 14 Issue 01 | Page 6

WildLife Group of the SAVA Low Dose Opioid, Low Dose a2 Agonist (HH Regime) for Immobilization of Large Wild Ungulates Dr. Hendrik J Hansen In twenty-one years of immobilizing wildlife in a very busy mixed veterinary practice in Bela-Bela, Limpopo, the challenge has always been to find the ideal immobilizing drug dosage for each specific situation. Then in 2013, a new challenge presented itself to every wildlife veterinarian in a booming wildlife industry in South Africa. Components of our basic drug group on which we had relied on for the last four decades became unavailable for long periods. This put our livelihood as wildlife vets at stake, and even at times prevented us from dealing with emergency cases such as dystocias. At this point, I decided to do a trial to investigate alternative drug combinations for immobilization. My main objective was to determine the lowest possible opioid dose to produce safe, efficient immobilizations. I set up a drug trial using African buffalo (Syncerus c. caffer) The animals were immobilized for pregnancy diagnosis, weaning, semen evaluation, horn measurements and collection of blood samples. Two hundred buffalo were divided into groups of five animals per pen. Each group was immobilized with a different drug combination. Each animal had its drug combination recorded and was carefully monitored during the immobilisation. Downtime and subjective observations on safety and effectivity of the anesthesia were noted. After completion of the work, each animal received reversal drugs and these doses and reversal combinations were recorded. Combinations of reversal drugs were also investigated to find a good combination. 6 At first, I tested combinations of thiafentanil with either azaperone, acepromazine, xylazine, medetomidine, diazepam or ketamine with DMSO or hyalase. From the results of these primary trials, it was decided to continue exploring combinations of thiafentanil, medetomidine and azaperone. I tested this combination with a constant azaperone dose and tapering the thiafentanil dose lower and the medetomidine dose higher for each consecutive group. I repeated this method according to the results of the previous group. Always trying a lower dose of opioid. I carried on until the opioid was left out at which stage the combination results in less effective immobilization. By following this method, I established the lowest safest and most effective dosage range for thiafentanil, medetomidine and azaperone combination for immobilization of African buffalo. No mortalities occurred during this trial and all the procedures was successfully completed. Animals immobilized was both sexes and ages from 6 months to 16 years old. I was very exiting with the results. The effective thiafentanil and medetomidine dosages were both much lower than what I anticipated on starting the trail. It was also much lower than dosages that was published for African buffalo for both drugs. The combination also turned out to be safer immobilization option than the combination that I traditionally used for immobilizations. The potentiating effect of the thiafentanil and medetomidine used in the optimal dosage rates for every specie turned out to be better than anticipated.