B"H
With due respect to philosophical eruditions and repudiations
let us understand the intention of the Greek terminology, for
instance what thinking makes philosophy neither psychology
nor anthropology? We can ponder the kindness of humanity as a
character trait and distinguish the manifestations of huma n
kindness in specific cultural applications . It is when we begin
to extrapolate those facts (co mpare and contrast the expressions )
in hope to arrive at the wider co mprehension of their meanin g
to those who involved in the scenarios that our intellectua l
pursuit beco mes philosophy. We may investigate how people
measure the energy of paradigms pertinent to existence, to
distinguish the natural, observable world from what we cannot
conceive such as the Unity of One. The human organ does not
function as an entity wholly independent, but must incorporate
syste ms of mutual concern.
Plunging into the depths of the issue, we consider the other
species that incorporate systems of mutual concern, and very
quickly discern that no element of the universe functions fo r
itself without existential association. Interdependency of forces
prevail in the ele mental circumstances of every living being.
Knowing that symbiotic interchange of elements indispensable
to survival qualifies it as a philosophical treatise; ergo, man is
charitable concerning the utilization of global resources because
his surviva l depends on it. Claims to superiority, exclusive
entitlement to goods and services, and tendency at excessive
hoarding show no altruism on the part of humanity, indicative
that man is disharmonious with the natural environment .
Charitable deeds are partia l to utilitarian considerations , but
remain intrinsic to the well-being of an incorporated universe.
When the dependence on gaiety (pleasure seeking) overco mes
the need for equanimity, the internal systems of huma n
perception process strange sensations that defies nature, with
such intensity as elicit a gasp! Huma nkind uses speech to utter
intonation that communicates his thoughts regarding the
intended receptor of his articulations. This certainly does not
attest to his intellectual superiority since the n oise is more or
less animalistic. When humans attend to their surroundings the y
can learn the non-verbal communication between members o f
the same and different species, we will find it utilitarian to the
absolute degree of perfectibility. Language skills do no t
distinguish dissimilar types as superior; each species brings its
231