one end. The adjustable hole admits atmospheric oxygen. An
initial small input of heat is added to the wood and oxygen until
burning occurs. A great deal of heat is produced once the wood
begins to burn. We know heat expands. Carbon, carbon dioxide
and water vapor are also produced as byproducts of the
combustion. Entropy is increased. Since entropy is increased,
so is pollution so perhaps we all can agree that this is a good
example of the destructive technology so characteristic of the
world in which we live.
In our example of a theoretical Reverse Thermodynamic machine the
byproducts of the previous example can be used as fuel. But
Schappeller's machine has the additional property of being
creative, that is, negatively entropic. Schappeller believed
this creative process to be individualistic, so we need a
specific template to use as a pattern for this creation. Heat,
water, and carbon dioxide are imputed into this machine. Quite
amazingly, oxygen is yielded as a byproduct of this reaction!
The heat is also absorbed in Schappeller's Reverse Thermodynamic
machine! This absorption of heat is another way of saying that
the machine is implosive in nature rather than expansive or
explosive as was the heat producing machine. What is most
amazing, however, is that entropy is actually reduced yielding,
something which has been created - wood!
Actually, this machine is not theoretical either. It exists and
works as we speak. These machines are all around us. We call
these machine "life". In this case our machine is a tree. In
the tree, energy, sunlight, is absorbed and combined in a cold
process with water and carbon dioxide to form wood. The template
used as a pattern for this seemingly intelligent, creative,
process is simply a seed. In this type of reaction the "cold"
force is something other than the absence of heat. This cold is
an active cold. It is a "densifying", implosive cold. It is a
life-giving cold. This is a cold, life giving force. To quote
Watson:
"This process is life force and the reverse of the second law of
thermodynamics; it is the vital force: Vril."
This is one huge difference between the physics of Schappeller
and Schauberger and the physics of the Nineteenth Century. The
physics of the Nineteenth Century explain everything in terms of
the inanimate. Laws of physics are written using inanimate
examples. Chemical reactions are described which stem from
inanimate models. Animate models are simply made to conform with
the inanimate assuming that life is just a special case which
eventually will be shown to be nothing but chemistry and so
subject to the same Second Thermodynamic Law as the inanimate.
Schappeller and Schauberger both say in their own ways that this
is not so. They say, each in their own ways, that a new and
different law of thermodynamics applies to living forces. They
say that this more akin to a life process than previous theories
allow.
They say this force is creative. Those that subscribed
183