History | Page 84

THE OLD CHARGES OE BRITISH EREEMASONS. 66 prominence because of entitled to its being the only one in which the term Free Mason occurs in a MS. of the 5, 6, 7, 8, 12; 15, and others, contain precisely the same expression, seventeenth century or earlier ; as Nos. 4, yhilst in some, "True Mason" and "Free all the Scottish versions are evideiitly of Mason" As will be noticed more fully hereafter, in his " History of Lodge No. 1, Scotland," Lyon, are both used.' English origin. " in the early part of the last century it was a custom of the Lodge of Kilwinning to sell to lodges " The its charters, written copies of this document (MS. 16), which was termed the old bulk (p. 107). receiving " "Kilwinning" version is very similar to Ko. 4, but Jiffers considerably from the Melrose" text. states that 17. "Atciieson Haven." a.d. 1666. Grand Lodge of Scotland. The "Musselburgh" or "Atcheson Haven" MS. was published in the "History of Freemasonry and the Grand Lodge of Scotland" (2d edit., 1859), by Mr W. A. Laurie; but having been slightly altered and modernised, a correct transcript of the original in Freemasons' Hall, Edinburgh, was printed by Lyon in his History of No. 1, Scotland. "Ane Narratione of the finding out of the craft of Masonrie, and by whom it heth been cherished," is engrossed in the earliest known minute-book of this old lodge, and bears date a.d. 1666. 18. "Aberdeen." a.d. 1670. Ancient Lodge at Aberdeen. Published in "Voice of Masonry," Chicago, U.S.A. (December 1874).- After the "Laws and Statutes "of the old lodge at Aberdeen, a.d. 1670 (the earliest preserved), conies the " Measson Charter," as it is called, and then the general laws, list of members, etc., etc., all beginning in 1670, when the " mark book" was commenced. As the records of this remarkable lodge will be again considered, they need scarcely be further particularised " ordained It may be stated, in brief, that its ancient members likeways that the Measson in this place. Charter be read at the entering of every Entered Apprentice, and the whole the charter in the hinder end of this Book Farewell." Laws of this Book. Ye shall find — This transcript does not seem to have been made from any complete standard text, as it breaks off abiiiptly 9 of the " General Charges" {vide MS. 15). It is curious, on perusing the copy, to find that, whilst the clerk was content to acknowledge the English origin of the text, by inserting the clause " True leidgeman to at clause the King God and of England," he gratified his national proclivities to the 19. by making the "First Charge" to read "true man to Tcirlc." holy "Melrose, No. 2." a.d. 1674. Old Lodge at Melrose, Scotland. Published in "Masonic Magazine" (January 1880). For the discovery of this important MS. in 1879, we Mr W. Fred. Vernon, of Kelso. Notwithstanding the number of masonic pilgrimages to are indebted to " Old Charges " eluded detecMelrose, and the diligent searches instituted from time to time, this copy of the the date mentioned. So far as I am aware, there was no allusion to this version until 1879, though its existence had been suspected by Hughan, who made frequent inquiries on the and tion until subject, induced friends to search for a copy, but without success, until Mr Vernon's visit, when the latter kindly furnished him with an exact transcript, afterwards published as before stated. I am thus precise as to these points, because it has been contended that this MS. is similar to the other Scottish versions, and that it is most probably a copy of No. 16.^ The facts, however, are, that in many portions it varies considerably from the other Scottish MSS., and the document is of far greater value than the other three (Nos. 16 One can almost positively declare it to be a transcript of an extinct MS. of a.d. 17, and 18) already described. 1581 (which I term Melrose No. 1), or even earlier, as the conclusion is a certificate from a " master free- 1 According to Fort (p. 190) the name "Freemason" has arisen from "the universal custom of the fraternity, without exception in England, and to some extent elsewhere, to call each other brother, or, in old French, frere mai;on, from wliich this nomenclature is derived." The argument, however, by whicli this contention is upheld is most inconclusive. ^ late Several Dr MSS. of the craft were reprinted in the A. G. Mackey. 'Freemason, October 18, 1879. " National Freemason," whilst under the editorial control of the