Hierro y Acero Edicion 55 | Page 15

acería Average of MgoSat Total 20 per. Mov. Avg. (Total) MgO Saturation Difference 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 2009 2010 2011 Jan 15-Jan Feb 2-Feb Dec 8-Dec2 8-Dec Nov 1-Nov 19-Nov Sep 25-Sep Oct 13-Oct 12-Aug Aug 31-Aug Jul 5-Jul 25-Jul Jun 13-Jun May 3-May 25-May Apr 15-Apr 3-Mar Mar 21-Mar Feb 13-Feb Jan 8-Jan 26-Jan Dec 18-Dec Nov 11-Nov 30-Nov Oct 24-Oct 23-Sep Jul 20-Jul Aug 13-Aug Sep 1-Sep Jun 8-Jun 26-Jun May 18-May Apr 9-Apr 29-Apr Jan Feb 19-Feb Mar 15-Mar 11-Nov 7-Dec 28-Dec 27-Jan 23-Oct 12-Jul 5-Aug 29-Aug 17-Sep 18-Jun 16-Feb 27-Mar 18-Apr Feb Mar Apr Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 2-Jan 22-Jan -1 2012 Fig. 13- Historial de la diferencia de saturación en el EAF2 de NYS Referencias 1. Marcus Kirschen, Marcus; Risonarta, Victor; Pfeifer, Herbert, “Energy efficiency and the influence of gas burners to the energy related carbon dioxide emissions of electric arc furnaces in steel industry”, Energy, Vol. 34, 2009, pp. 1065–1072 2. O. Quintanilla y G. Fernández, “EAF Energy Optimization at Nucor-Yamato Steel”, Enero 2009, pp. 78. 3. E. Pretorius y R. Carlisle. “Foamy Slag Fundamentals and their Practical Application to Electric Furnace Steelmaking”, Iron and Steelmaking, No. 10, 1999, pp. 79-88. 15 HIERRO yACERO/AIST MÉXICO