acería
Average of MgoSat
Total
20 per. Mov. Avg. (Total)
MgO Saturation Difference
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
2009
2010
2011
Jan 15-Jan
Feb 2-Feb
Dec 8-Dec2
8-Dec
Nov 1-Nov
19-Nov
Sep 25-Sep
Oct 13-Oct
12-Aug
Aug 31-Aug
Jul 5-Jul
25-Jul
Jun 13-Jun
May 3-May
25-May
Apr 15-Apr
3-Mar
Mar 21-Mar
Feb 13-Feb
Jan 8-Jan
26-Jan
Dec 18-Dec
Nov 11-Nov
30-Nov
Oct 24-Oct
23-Sep
Jul 20-Jul
Aug 13-Aug
Sep 1-Sep
Jun 8-Jun
26-Jun
May 18-May
Apr 9-Apr
29-Apr
Jan
Feb 19-Feb
Mar 15-Mar
11-Nov
7-Dec
28-Dec
27-Jan
23-Oct
12-Jul
5-Aug
29-Aug
17-Sep
18-Jun
16-Feb
27-Mar
18-Apr
Feb
Mar
Apr
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan 2-Jan
22-Jan
-1
2012
Fig. 13- Historial de la diferencia de saturación en el EAF2 de NYS
Referencias
1. Marcus Kirschen, Marcus; Risonarta, Victor; Pfeifer, Herbert,
“Energy efficiency and the influence of gas burners to the
energy related carbon dioxide emissions of electric arc furnaces in steel industry”, Energy, Vol. 34, 2009, pp. 1065–1072
2. O. Quintanilla y G. Fernández, “EAF Energy Optimization at
Nucor-Yamato Steel”, Enero 2009, pp. 78.
3. E. Pretorius y R. Carlisle. “Foamy Slag Fundamentals and
their Practical Application to Electric Furnace Steelmaking”,
Iron and Steelmaking, No. 10, 1999, pp. 79-88.
15 HIERRO yACERO/AIST MÉXICO