HealthStream_2021 Annual Report Medical Staff Credentialing | Page 34

The following table shows the range of responses that suggest the degree of implementation of each surveyed activity within the Process Improvement initiative :
Implementing electronic , paperless credentialing files for your providers
Implementing an automated , paperless process for primary source verifications
Implementing an automated , paperless process for online provider applications
Implementing an automated , paperless process for delineation and tracking of privileges
Reducing initial and re-credentialing time frames through automation
Implementing a paperless process for your committee reviews and decisions
Automating the peer review process
Automating OPPE performance profiles and workflow
Fully , Successfully Implemented
Partially , Successfully Implemented
Unsuccessfully Implemented
PROCESS IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE
No Attempt at Implementation
Don ’ t Know / Not Applicable
45.6 % 35.3 % 5.8 % 12.6 % 0.7 %
44.5 % 39.1 % 4.9 % 8.9 % 2.6 %
44.4 % 33.3 % 7.1 % 14.4 % 0.9 %
37.4 % 35.2 % 6.6 % 16.5 % 4.4 %
33.9 % 54.3 % 4.0 % 6.9 % 0.9 %
31.9 % 36.5 % 7.9 % 20.3 % 3.5 %
19.0 % 29.7 % 11.6 % 26.9 % 12.7 %
14.3 % 34.4 % 11.3 % 23.2 % 16.8 %
NOTE : Text in green indicates items that are most closely related to improvement of the overall PROCESS IMPROVEMENT initiative based on a step-wise regression analysis of the results . These items should be prioritized for improvement as they are most predictive of respondents ’ overall ratings of the PROCESS IMPROVEMENT initiative .
2020 Annual Report on Medical Staff Credentialing 18