Healthcare Hygiene magazine May 2020 | Page 18

Continued From Page 16 The CDC states that an effective FFR decontamination method should reduce the pathogen burden, maintain the function of the FFR, and present no residual chemical hazard. What is important to remember is that the ability of the respirator filter media to withstand cleaning and disinfection are not NIOSH performance requirements. The NIOSH’s National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL) and other researchers have investigated the impact of various decontamination methods on filtration efficiency, facepiece fit of FFRs, and the ability to reduce viable virus or bacteria on the FFRs. As the CDC notes, “Because ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), vaporous hydrogen peroxide (VHP), and moist heat showed the most promise as potential methods to decontaminate FFRs, researchers, decontamination companies, healthcare systems, or individual hospitals should focus current efforts on these technologies. Specifically, the effectiveness of using these methods should be explored further with specific FFR models based on the manufacturers’ support to better understand the impact on the respirator performance, including filtration and fit. The respirator manufacturer should be consulted about the impact of the method on their respirators prior to considering the use of any method. When information from the manufacturer or a third-party is available showing that respirators can be successfully decontaminated without impacting respirator performance, then FFRs decontaminated following those recommendations can be worn for any patient-care activities.” The CDC notes that in the absence of guidance or when information is available that a respirator cannot be decon- taminated without negatively impacting the performance, respirators may still be decontaminated; however, the CDC emphasizes, “given the uncertainties on the impact of decontamination on respirator performance, these FFRs should not be worn by healthcare personnel when performing or present for an aerosol-generating procedure. No current data exists supporting the effectiveness of these decontamination methods specifically against SARS-CoV-2 on an FFR. Other pathogens may also be present on FFRs and there is only limited data available for other pathogens. Further work is needed to assure SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens are inactivated. Therefore, even after decontamination, these FFRs should be handled carefully.” The following precautionary measures should be taken prior to using a decontaminated FFR, according to the CDC: ●Clean hands with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitizer before and after touching or adjusting the FFR. ●Avoid touching the inside of the FFR. ●Use a pair of clean (non-sterile) gloves when donning and performing a user seal check. ●Visually inspect the FFR to determine if its integrity has been compromised. ●Check that components such as the straps, nose bridge, and nose foam material did not degrade, which can affect the quality of the fit, and seal. ●If the integrity of any part of the FFR is compromised, or if a successful user seal check cannot be performed, discard the FFR and try another FFR. 18 ●Users should perform a user seal check immediately after they don each FFR and should not use an FFR on which they cannot perform a successful user seal check. There have been reports of healthcare personnel using disinfectant wipes to decontaminate and reuse respiratory attire. Addressing this issue were Heimbuch and Harnish (2019), who evaluated respirators that were cleaned with three types of wipes: hypochlorite, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), or nonantimicrobial. Particle penetration following cleaning yielded mean values <5 percent. The highest penetrations were observed in FFRs cleaned with BAC wipes. The BAC wipe caused one sample of FFRs to exceed 5 percent penetration. Filter penetration following various decontamination methods was shown in this study to vary based on the decontamination method and the model of FFR. It’s an issue that requires more research, experts say. Fit-testing of respiratory protection has also been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. In a memorandum issued mid-March, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued temporary enforcement guidance to compliance safety and health officers for enforcing the Respiratory Protection standard, 29 CFR § 1910.134, within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the shortages of N95 filtering facepiece respirators. The memorandum provides temporary regarding required annual fit-testing which will be enforced until further notice. It comes following President Trump’s March 11 directive to the Department of Health and Human Services to “take all appropriate and necessary steps with respect to general use respirators to facilitate their emergency use by healthcare personnel in healthcare facilities and elsewhere.” According to the memorandum, “OSHA recommends healthcare personnel (HCP) employers follow existing CDC guidelines, including taking measures to conserve supplies of these respirators while safeguarding HCP. One such measure is that healthcare employers may provide HCP with another respirator of equal or higher protection, such as N99 or N100 filtering facepieces, reusable elastomeric respirators with appropriate filters or cartridges, or powered air purifying respirators (PAPR). Another measure is that healthcare employers may change the method of fit testing from a destructive method (i.e., quantitative) to a non-de- structive method (i.e., qualitative). For filtering facepiece respirators, qualitative and quantitative fit-testing methods are both effective at determining whether the respirator fits properly. The fitted respirator can then be safely used for work tasks that require respiratory protection. (For additional guidance, see Strategies for Optimizing the Supply of N95 Respirators, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/ hcp/respirator-supply-strategies.html)" OSHA says that its field offices may exercise enforcement discretion concerning the annual fit-testing requirement as long as employers: ● Make a good-faith effort to comply with 29 CFR § 1910.134 ● Use only NIOSH-certified respirators ● Implement CDC and OSHA strategies for optimizing the may 2020 • www.healthcarehygienemagazine.com