Healthcare Hygiene magazine February_2020 | Page 12

IPs to “making their business case” but should work with them to collaboratively develop the best human, IT and financial resources to elevate their organizations to best in class. IPs provide crucial institutional oversight by developing policies, maintaining surveillance and complying with regulations required for CMS funding and accreditation. They use their extensive knowledge, skills and abilities to assist in determining potential root causes of infectious outbreaks with quick notification to county, state and other agencies such as CDC. The investigation of sink drains, faucets, ice makers, water holding tanks, showers, air circulation patterns and other potential sources that harbor organisms is meticulously coordinated by IPs. Finally, IPs act as internal advisors related to their organizations’ compliance to requirements and guidelines by OSHA, NIOSH, EPA, TJC, CDC, and other agencies. GG: The CDC reports there are approximately 90,000 deaths each year related to healthcare-associated infections (HAI), with 1 in 25 people in the U.S. who get this type of infection. HAIs contribute to prolonged hospital stays and increased healthcare costs, ranging from $28 billion to $45 billion in estimated annual hospital costs. The role of the IP is crucial to help identify best practices to be incorporated into evidence-based guidelines. Their role provides the ability for surveillance and monitoring the infections to not only contribute to the care of the patient, but provide insight for the staff on infection prevention protocols. The IP is engaged in all aspects of patient care, including perspectives of laboratory, environmental and pharmaceutical. The IP provides important data for the hospital C-suite to understand the impact of infection control measures on improving patient outcomes. HB: There are a couple of aspects to a successful business case model. One is trying to tie it directly to cost savings and also the overall benefit of having a program that is strong enough that at the facility can meet quality targets and does not get penalized through CMS — or any other organizations — on overall performance of those quality metrics. It is helpful to keep those outcomes in mind and the cost impact of having high rates of infections and potentially having a CMS penalty in terms of lack of reimbursement to the hospital. HHM What role can value analysis professionals play in helping infection preventionists make the business case for HAI prevention? BS: Value analysis programs should include infection preventionists in the review and decision-making process for equipment and supplies that will come into contact with mucous membranes or nonintact or intact skin, paying close attention to reusable devices that will need to be cleaned, disinfected and/or sterilized between uses on the same or another patient. Reusable instruments and endoscopes have been implicated in resistant bacterial outbreaks. Soaps, lotions, and other hand hygiene products, gloves, sharps safety, regulated medical waste containers and practices, surface cleaning wipes and products for care of environmental surfaces are among the most crucial decisions that require IP guidance, review and approval. Value analysis professionals 12 are keenly aware that institutional decisions that could result in a change of urinary and indwelling vascular catheters, peripheral IVs, as well as practices related to insertion, maintenance and dwell times of catheters, ET and feeding tubes, and other devices must come under the purview of IPs who assure the rate of HAIs do not increase or may provide other mechanisms to potentially prevent them. GG: Value analysis professionals play a significant role in helping IPs make the case for HAI prevention especially regarding new and or existing products or equipment used within healthcare organizations. IPs are typically included in the value analysis process, so they are able to evaluate the products or equipment to determine its potential effect on healthcare-acquired infections. Their expertise is used to help guide decisions especially around products or equipment that could impact the closely monitored infection rates such as CAUTI, SSI, CLABSI, etc. HHM How can the hospital epidemiologist help the IP with making a business case for infection prevention and control? HB: There is literature available that tries to estimate costs associated with individual infections, and so the epidemiologist and the infection preventionist can work together to approach the hospital leadership. And then the epidemiologist, as the infectious disease physician, can also bring that clinical personal perspective to the business case as well, and provide examples from their own experiences of patients who’ve had bad outcomes, the long-term sequelae of having an infection or dying from a central line infection. And sometimes though in theory, the business case should be all about numbers, and not about those personal stories, sometimes those personal stories can serve as a good hook to reach people and get them more engaged. HHM How open are today’s hospital leaders to the business case for infection prevention and control? HB: I want to say they are all very open to it, but I think it is probably variable across facilities and across regions and it remains a challenge. The financial situation around healthcare in this country remains very complicated, and the way that payment comes in and goes out and is allocated makes it difficult to directly attribute cost savings to areas where prevention work is conducted, and the silos of budgeting and payment models that complicate matters. If you think big-picture and long-term, there is increasing pressure from third-party payors and increasing pressure and interest in paying for the overall cost of care, of insuring a life over time and doing that by lump-sum payment to a healthcare system or to a facility or to an insurance company. And I think to the extent that that continues to move forward, it can help infection prevention more than a more traditional full fee-for-service model. We know that stopping payment for complications definitely ups the ante on being able to determine what types of infections are preventable and what are not. I do hope hospitals are truly contemplating and appreciating the value of their infection prevention programs.  february 2020 • www.healthcarehygienemagazine.com