Healthcare Hygiene magazine April 2020 | Page 16

state, and local officials reported that hospitals needed additional equipment and capital improvements— including medical stockpiles, personal protective equipment, quaran- tine and isolation facilities, and air handling and filtering equipment—to enhance preparedness. According to our hospital survey, availability of medical equipment varied greatly between hospitals, and few hospitals seemed to have adequate equipment and supplies to handle a large-scale infectious disease outbreak. While most hospitals had, for every 100 staffed beds, at least one ventilator, one personal protective equipment suit, or one isolation bed, half of the hospitals had, for every 100 staffed beds, fewer than six ventilators, 3three or fewer personal protective equipment suits, and fewer than four isolation beds.” Preparedness Best Practices As Toner and Waldhor (2020) observe, “The current COVID-19 epidemic looks very much like an early influenza pandemic in many important respects. It is spreading from person to person efficiently, much like influenza, including some degree of pre-symptomatic spread. Although the true case fatality rate is as yet uncertain, all evidence suggests that it is as severe as, if not more severe than, influenza pandemics of the last century. The case fatality rate (CFR) of confirmed COVID-19 patients in China is estimated to be 1 percent to 3 percent, although this may not account for all mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic infections. In some regions of China outside Hubei, the CFR has been less than 1 percent. For comparison, the CFR of the 2009 influenza pandemic was around 0.1 percent, the 1968 and 1957 pandemics in the U.S. were about 0.5 percent, and the CFR of the 1918 pandemic was estimated to be 2.5 percent in the U.S.” Toner and Waldhor (2020) add that, “The impact of a COVID-19 pandemic on hospitals is expected to be severe in the best of circumstances. Currently, U.S. hospitals routinely operate at or near-full capacity and have limited ability to rapidly increase services. There are currently shortages of healthcare workers of all kinds. Emergency departments are overcrowded and often must divert patients to other hospitals. In recent years, there has been a reduction in the overall number of hospitals, hospital beds, and emergency rooms. During an epidemic, the healthcare workforce would be greatly reduced. Healthcare workers would face a high risk of infection because of contact with infected patients; many would need to stay home to care for sick relatives, and, in the absence of vaccine, others might fear coming to work lest they bring a lethal infection home to their families. The provision of medical services to both COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 patients may be adversely affected in most communities.” Detailed modeling projections for COVID-19 have not yet been released by the U.S. government or WHO; however, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released official planning assumptions for pandemic influenza, ranging from a moderate pandemic like 1968 or 1957, to one based on a very severe pandemic like 1918. They differ by more than 10-fold in the number expected to need hospitalization, intensive care, and mechanical ventilation, emphasize Toner and Waldhor (2020). 16 HHS PANDEMIC PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS Moderate Scenario (1968-like) NEEDING MEDICAL CARE NEEDING HOSPITALIZATIONS NEEDING ICU 38 Million 1 Million 200,000 Very Severe Scenario (1918-like) 38 Million 9.6 Million 2.9 Million Toner and Waldhor (2020) define preparedness as “Every hospital, in collaboration with other hospitals and public health agencies, will be able to provide appropriate care to COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization while maintain- ing other essential medical services in the community, both during and after a pandemic.” The experts say healthcare facilities should focus their initial preparedness efforts in the following priority areas: ➊ Comprehensive and realistic planning based on actual CDC FluSurge projections in each hospital, and collaborative planning among all hospitals in a region. ➋ Limiting the nosocomial spread of the virus to protect the healthcare workers and, thus, maintain a hospital work- force; prevent the hospital from being a disease amplifier; and protect the non–COVID-19 patients from infection, so as to maintain the ability to provide essential non–COVID-19 healthcare. ➌ Maintaining, augmenting, and stretching the hospital workforce. ➍ Allocating limited healthcare resources in a rational, ethical, and organized way so as to do the greatest good for the greatest number. To implement these priority goals, Toner and Waldhor (2020) say hospitals should undertake the following specific actions: ● ● Implement a comprehensive and realistic planning process that includes employing at least one full-time hospital emergency manager in each hospital as well as dedicate a full-time infection preventionist to work on infection prevention aspects of the preparations, including education, training, and exercises. ● ● Create a pandemic preparedness committee (or use an existing emergency management committee) that includes representatives of all clinical and support departments as well as senior administrators. ● ● Participate in a local healthcare coalition, which includes neighboring hospitals, local public health agencies, and emergency management. Members of multi-hospital health systems should integrate system-wide planning with local planning with other local hospitals. ● ● Be able to make 30 percent of licensed-bed capacity available for COVID-19 patients on one week’s notice. About 10 percent to 20 percent of a hospital’s bed capacity can be mobilized within a few hours by expediting discharges, using discharge holding areas, converting single rooms to double rooms, and opening closed areas, if staffing is available. Another 10 percent can be obtained within a few days by converting flat spaces, such as lobbies, waiting areas, and classrooms. april 2020 • www.healthcarehygienemagazine.com