HCBA Lawyer Magazine Vol. 30, No. 3 | Page 75

wOrKers’ COmPeNsatiON CaseLaw uPdate Workers’ Compensation Section Continued from page 72 benefits, relying in part on the employer/carrier’s IME report, despite a hearsay objection. The First District held that an IME report can be admitted and relied upon over a hearsay objection, without a deposition to authenticate the report or opinions. The opinion cites conflict with a leading text on IME reports, Florida Evidence, by Professor Charles Ehrhardt (West Publishing) (1999 ed.) In another recent case of note, Liberty Mutual v. Miller, 278 So.3d 948 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019), the First District dismissed an appeal of a decision denying a motion to enforce settlement, because it was not a final order or an appealable non-final order. In a third recent case, Hernandez v. Food Market Corp, No. 1D18- 4406 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019), a claimant, who was an illegal alien, admitted she gave an invalid Social Security Number on a form to claim benefits, because she believed that she would not receive benefits unless she gave a Social Security Number. Interesting arguments on immigration and federal law were raised, but the benefits were denied on the premise that intentionally giving the false number constituted fraud, which results in forfeiture of benefits under the Act. In a final recent case of note, an award of costs to the employer/ carrier was affirmed in Coto v Univision, No. 1D19-0533 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). In the case, the day before a final hearing on a PRP injection and surgery, the employer/carrier authorized the PRP injection, and the claimant voluntarily dismissed the petition for benefits in hopes the PRP injection would be successful without the surgery. Subsequently, the surgery at issue was authorized. The employer/carrier filed a petition for costs and was awarded $1,074.34 because of the voluntary dismissal. The award was affirmed per curium, with a comment in the concurrence that the Legislature should, “consider whether an employee who files a petition for benefits in good faith should be subject to the imposition of costs.” n Author: Anthony V. Cortese – Anthony Cortese, Attorney at Law Want to reach THOUSANDS OF ATTORNEYS in the Tampa Bay area? Call (813) 221-7777 for more informaTion. JAN - FEB 2020 | HCBA LAWYER 73