HCBA Lawyer Magazine Vol. 29, No. 5 | Page 40

TELEMEDICINE IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S CROSS-HAIRS Health Care Law Section 23;897 =//=<99;:6<=)=54<#=*=1;9:<9=11'=*=<8:= (54%3=)=$398:<97=57%86;47=+59=23849<:= As the government spends more and more money on telemedicine, increased enforcement is likely. T he last few years have seen an explosive growth of telemedicine. Some estimates peg the global telemedicine technologies market, including hardware, software, and services, at nearly $40 billion in 2018. Incredibly, this market is projected to grow by 18 percent annually over the next six years, reaching $103 billion in 2024. Given the increased use of telemedicine, federal prosecutors and regulators are beginning to take note. Here, we chronicle some recent trends by prosecutors and offer practical advice. Legal Developments The first development in the telemedicine enforcement space came in April 2018, when the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS/OIG), issued a report entitled “CMS Paid Practitioners for Telehealth Services that did not Meet Medicare Requirements.” As its title suggests, the report took issue with telemedicine providers and noted that upwards of one- third of all telemedicine claims were improper. On the heels of that report, the Department of Justice announced an indictment in Tennessee linked to a “billion-dollar telemedicine fraud conspiracy.” According to the indictment, the defendants set up an elaborate scheme in which a telemedicine company “fraudulently solicited insurance coverage information and prescriptions from consumers across the country.” And finally, in December 2018, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Utah announced a multi-million-dollar False Claims Act settlement. The United States alleged that the com - pany violated Medicare’s prohibition against telephone solicitation of covered products to beneficiaries. Best Practices In light of this enhanced enforcement scrutiny, providers interested in telemedicine would be well-served by erring on the side of caution as the regulatory landscape is still being developed. We outline a few practical recommendations that are best practices. Make Sure the Patient is Receiving Telemedicine Services at a Qualified Site. Telehealth services must be furnished to a beneficiary at an eligible originating site, which is one of the following: the office of a practitioner, a hospital, a critical access hospital (CAH), a rural health clinic, a federally qualified health center, a hospital-based or CAH-based renal dialysis center, a skilled nursing facility, or a community mental health center. Continued on page 39 Interested in joining the HCBA Lawyer Referral & Information Service? Call (813) 221-7780 or visit https: //hillsbarlrs.com/pages/for-lawyers.  2 <: = - = 3 / , ; = 7 9 8 6 *==45+<=.<0:;1