Hazard Risk Resilience Magazine Volume 1 Issue 2 | Page 7

07 The role of beliefs and values in shaping evidence for climate change policy Beliefs and values are often viewed as separate from scientific evidence, but they can affect how evidence is generated and presented, especially with regard to policy. Ruth Machen, a research postgraduate in the Department of Geography, is investigating the boundary between evidence and belief in Scottish climate change policy. In 2011, the government of Scotland redesigned how it engages with climate science in order to make publicallyfunded science more responsive to the needs of policy. This once again challenges traditional notions of a clear, demarcated, linear relationship between science and policy. Concepts of expertise and evidence are being called into focus and the two-way exchange is made more explicit. How is this move affecting the way in which climate change knowledge is framed and, in what ways does it affect the understanding of scientific knowledge as evidence? Does distinguishing evidence from belief to legitimise policy decisions make sense under current conditions of scientific uncertainty and controversy surrounding climate policy? In her PhD research, Machen will address these questions in studying how evidence-based policymaking is constructed both politically and scientifically. Prioritising early cancer diagnosis for improving community health and saving lives CANCER survival rates can be significantly improved if patients are diagnosed early. The number of pre-referral consultations is often used as an indicator of patient experience, along with time intervals between first consultation and diagnosis. Professor Greg Rubin, together with colleagues from the University of Cambridge and North Wales Clinical School, examined data from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England. They found a wide variation between different cancers in the proportion of patients who had visited their general practitioner three or more times prior to hospital referral. Their analysis accounted for patients’ age, sex, ethnicity and measures of socioeconomic deprivation. Both young patients aged 16-24 and women were more likely to have had three or more pre-referral consultations for most common forms of cancer, but not stomach cancers and melanoma, in comparison to older, white and male patients. There was also variation in the number of consultations according to cancer type. For example, patients with colon, ovarian, pancreatic, lung cancers and Hodgkin’s lymphoma were more likely to visit their GP three or more times before hospital referral. Findings from the study can help prioritise initiatives and further research. The researchers recommend further exploration and assessment of physician-level education interventions, further development of point-of-care decision aids, risk calculators and diagnostic tests, and redesigning of systems already in place in order to make best use of specialist diagnostic tests such as imaging and endoscopy. Key Finding: There are inequalities in speed of cancer diagnosis for younger adults, women, ethnic minorities, and for some types of cancer which require further research and the development of targeted initiatives. Scotland leads Western Europe in setting C02 emission reduction targets of 42 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050. ‘Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England’. The Lancet Oncology. 13,4:353-365. http://dro.dur. ac.uk/9316