ENVIRONMENT struck the 1,980 APARTMENTS with golf in Villanueva1 . The opinion of the Environment , published on 13 / 11 / 2008 in the BOA , was known only one day after the official signing of the agreement of the GOVERNMENT OF ARAGON which will build in this municipality about 10,000 VPO in the medium term . An agreement reached , thanks to its cataloging as of general interest for the community , by the Minister of Public Works of the Government of Aragon , ALFON- SO VICENTE , and the mayor of Villanueva . And that managed a large bag of 163 HECTARES of public land to build exclusively protected housing in case it is needed at any time . The controversy has accompanied from the beginning the development of this URBANIZATION . As reported on 15 / 02 / 20092 , in exchange for works for the private university San Jorge - valued jointly in more than 70 million - , the City accepted the concentration of dozens of plots dispersed by the municipality in a single sector Of 100 hectares , to which was added the requalification of another 100 contiguous .
The housing crisis reduced golf fever in the metropolitan environment1 . The conjuncture of the urbanization in Villanueva de Gállego , which also involved the construction of the University of San Jorge , is different from other cases . Promoted by Inurasa -filial of Bruesa- from an urban operation that generated great controversy , the project contemplates the construction of almost 2,000 flats near El Zorongo , next to the area in which precisely the Government of Aragon announced a plan for 10,000 Housing protected in 2008 . The DGA still had to approve the partial plan , an indispensable step for the compliance of the agreement . “ The promoters are not in a hurry ,” they ratified from the City Hall , where there was some concern ( according to the news ) in 2008 .
CAJA IMACULADA
In Caja Inmaculada , everything that has been transferred to us from management or the management team , both employees and society , has made good the phrase of George Orwell the only certainty is that everything was false ; And there is not much to go into this conclusion , it is only necessary to consult the newspaper libraries for this statement to be fully demonstrated .
THE TRUTH is the following , the CNMV indicates that CAI was removed on January 13 , 2012 as a depository and as a Credit Entity did so on May 24 , 2012 . Previously , in the relevant fact of CNMV 152807 , Dated November 4 , 2011 , announced the call for a general meeting for November 21 , 2011 , which approved the transfer of the FINANCIAL BUSINESS , assets and liabilities , to Banco Caja , dated January 1 , 2011 2012 . And this maneuver is done because CAI could not continue alone as a financial institution , because it did not meet the requirements that the current LEGIS- LATION demanded at that time , due to the serious deterioration that maintained in its portfolio of assets , in other words was In a situation of technical PRE-BANKRUPTCY .
The BANCO DE ESPAÑA , which has not had three inspections and is covered by the Bank of Spain ’ s Autonomy Law , and especially the Law on Discipline and Intervention of Financial Institutions , in force since 1988 , did not intervene at any time . Did nothing , in front of CAI ’ s management , from its GOVERNING BODIES ( Executive Committee , which is the competent sanctioning body ), in order to alleviate the situation of plunder and criminal management to which CAI was subjected . The big figures are eloquent , Caja in 2012 gave a LOSS OF 1,042 MILLION EUROS , in 2013 were transferred to SAREB 2.2 billion euros and Caja continued to post losses of 230 million euros . How many millions of these came from CAI ?