Grassroots Grassroots - Vol 19 No 1 | Page 22

NEWS New global study positioned to dominate thinking about herbivores and plant bio- diversity and savannas Dr Dave Thompson Current Address: Biodiversity Scientist, SAEON Ndlovu Node E-mail Address: [email protected] Reprinted From: http://bit.ly/2GTLGqH H erbivores impact on plant bio- diversity in many of the world’s ecosystems, but the magnitude and direction of these herbivore effects (positive, negative or no effect) vary widely within and among ecosystems. Understanding such impacts is vi- tal for conserving plant diversity and ecosystem functioning in a human-al- tered world, especially in disturbance- dependent grasslands and savannas where herbivore communities are typi- cally species-poor, and often numeri- cally reduced versions, of their former selves. Prevailing theory predicts that the activ- ity of herbivores – primarily being feed- ing by grazers, should increase plant bi- odiversity in environments where rainfall is high (high productivity), and have the opposite effect in dry environments (low productivity). However, isolated studies reveal that not all grassy systems con- form to this theory, with deviations from the pattern being seen. This calls into question the generality of the role of system productivity in gov- erning herbivore effects on diversity and suggests that alternative mechanisms may be driving how animals impact on their environments. New global study Now, a study recently published in Na- ture Ecology & Evolution is providing just that alternative mechanism, and is offering rather compelling evidence which explains how and why herbivores impact plant biodiversity. In grappling to explain different pat- terns in how herbivore-exclusion plots at the Konza Prairie LTER (Long Term Ecological Research) station (USA) and in the Kruger National Park (South Af- rica) affected plant biodiversity imme- diately after and in the years following herbivore removal, a group of research- ers hit on an intriguing idea. Could the ability of herbivores to change the abundance of the dominant plant species – which is linked to those species being palatable or not to the herbivores, affect resource availability and so either encourage or prohibit ad- ditional species? To test this hypothesis, the researchers – led by Dr Sally Koerner of the Univer- sity of North Carolina Greensborough and including Dr Dave Thompson from SAEON’s Ndlovu Node, established the ‘Grazing Exclosure Consortium’ to con- duct a meta-level analysis comparing findings from large herbivore exclosure experiments from around the world. Ul- timately plant species composition data from 252 sites spanning six continents and a large rainfall gradient (mean an- nual precipitation 45-1511 mm) were ‘donated’ for inclusion in the analyses. To be included in the Grazing Exclosure Database, sites had to meet five crite- ria: (1) exclosures had to be located in herbaceous dominated communities – sites ranged from tallgrass prairie to al- pine meadows to desert; (2) herbivores with adult body mass > 45 kg were ex- cluded from plots using fencing, with adjacent plots exposed to herbivores; (3) data had to be collected after at least three years of herbivore exclusion; 60% of sites provided data reflecting 10 or more years of grazing manipulation and 18% of sites provided herbaceous data following 50 years of exclusion; (4) plots inside and outside the exclosure had to be sampled at the same time and sam- pling intensity; and (5) data had to be available at the species level. And the result? Figure 1 (a + b): Herbivore exclusion plots erected at Konza Prairie LTER station (left) and in the Kruger National Park in 2006 showed differing effects of grazing (or rather, the lack of grazing) on plant diversity. In attempting to explain this, researchers were forced to challenge conventional thinking. 21 A positive, but weak relationship be- tween grazing-induced change in spe- cies richness and annual rainfall (as a proxy for productivity) was found. But the pattern emerging from the data showed a much stronger relationship Grassroots Vol 19 No 1 March 2019