Graslander Uitgawe 4: Lente | Page 7

LATEST RESEARCH IN LIME RECOMMENDATIONS AN EVALUATION OF LIME REQUIREMENT METHODS USED FOR SOUTH AFRICAN SOILS Vincent van der Berg, Dr Aisla Hardy & Dr Pieter Raath In collaboration with Stellenbosch University, Bemlab recently conducted a M.Sc Agric study (Vincent van den Berg) to evaluate several widely used methods to predict soil lime requirements, using 20 acidic South African top and sub-soils (Western Cape, Eastern Free State, Northwest, KwaZulu Natal) with a wide range of properties. Seven soil lime requirement methods that are currently used in South Africa were evaluated against a standard CaCO 3 incubation soil lime requirement procedure. 1. the original Eksteen method with organic matter correction factor (OMCF) , commonly used in the Western Cape; 2. two modifications of the Eksteen method, namely: a. Eksteen-KCl method, where the use of 1M KCl exchangeable acidity instead of titratable acidity at pH 7, and b. Modified-Eksteen method, where a correction factor was applied to titratable acidity that was derived from soil data obtained in this study; 3. the Cedara method, most commonly used in KwaZulu-Natal; 4. the ARC-SGI method, developed primarily for Free State soils by the ARC- Small Grain Institute in Bethlehem; 5. the Shoemaker-McLean-Pratt single buffer (SMP-SB) method most commonly used in the North East and North Central regions of the USA; TECHNICAL 6. the Adams and Evans single buffer (AE-SB) method mo st commonly used in the South East and Mid-Atlantic regions of USA. T he original Eksteen and Cedara methods were found to be highly correlated with incubation soil lime requirement, yet consistently underestimated soil lime requirement. The modified-Eksteen method, however, was found to be highly correlated with incubation soil lime requirement, and was a good predictor of soil lime requirement. In fact, titratable acidity was found to be the soil property that most strongly related to soil lime requirement. The ARC-SGI method was a considerably poor predictor of soil lime requirement, and tended to grossly overestimate soil lime requirement. The two buffer methods were also highly correlated with incubation soil lime requirement, and with some recalibration resulted in having a high accuracy of predicting soil lime requirement. Since the buffer methods are difficult to implement commercially, the most accurate method at our disposal for determination of soil lime requirement on a wide range of soils from this study was the modified Eksteen method. The combination of soil properties (Table 5-4) that most strongly influenced the SOIL LIME REQUIREMENT of each method were evaluated in the study. The results from this study indicate that the most vital soil properties that need to be determined in order to sufficiently estimate the SOIL LIME REQUIREMENT of a soil are, in no particular order: Walkley-Black C, titratable acidity at pH 7.0, exchangeable cations, buffered CEC at pH 7.0 and texture. Considering these findings, however, it is crucial that more research be carried out in order to evaluate the economic implications of basing SOIL LIME REQUIREMENT on the above-mentioned soil properties, in relation to crop performance and long-term soil management method.