Gold Magazine November - December 2013, Issue 32 | Page 74

BANKING he t f ng e o on yi ic ati Pa Pr tin s ra c ro P H ans-Joachim Duebel, founder of the Berlin-based financial and real estate sector specialist Finpolconsult, recently produced a study for the Centre for Financial Studies of the University of Frankfurt entitled The Capital Structure of Banks and Practice of Bank Restructuring: Eight Case Studies on Current Bank Restructurings in Europe. One of case studies was Laiki (Cyprus Popular) Bank. Duebel, who is one of the speakers at the forthcoming Cyprus Banking Forum, presented by Gold, at the Hilton Park Hotel, Nicosia on 5 December, talks about the Europgroup’s handling of the Cyprus banking crisis. By JohnVickers Gold: You have written that what happened in Cyprus with Laiki Bank and Bank of Cyprus was “a classic US strategy”. Why do you think it was implemented in Europe? Hans-Joachim Duebel: Because the fatigue of policy makers and their advisors with taxpayer-funded bank rescues had reached a peak by 2012-13. Even junior bond creditors had been left untouched in the first wave of bank rescues in Northern Europe (2008-2010). There is a parallel with the US S&L crisis of the 1980s, when it also took a couple of years to change policies from bail-out to bail-in. The turning point for Europe was, in fact, not Cyprus in November 2012, but Spain in June 2012. At that time, Germany was asked at the European summit to back up direct recapitalizations of banks while some Spanish Cajas were still offering junior bond holders an exit at par (no losses). This prompted Germany to ask Spain for a sovereign guarantee for the eurozone funds and pass a bail-in law. The ECB turned around on this after Germany had given green light in late July on the OMT. You may see it as a quid pro quo. Gold: You have described as “misguided” the Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA) from the European Central Bank. What do you mean? H-J. D.: Let us consider Laiki. Some of the ELA that built up from September 2011 until the ECB pulled the plug in February 2013 had been used to fund collateral – covered bonds and sovereign bonds – that had fallen out of ordinary ECB repo. So far, so good. However, during that period Laiki also was constantly losing large amounts of deposits, mostly from its International Business Unit and from other foreign depositors. Back on the envelope, perhaps half of the ELA turned around and left Cyprus again. Without the ECB providing ELA de facto without limitations, Laiki would have been unable to cater for this capital flight. The ECB understood that supporting capital flight from a bank with solvency problems dramatically undermines the credibility of its overall liquidity policy framework. In September 2013, the ECB tightened its ELA policies. Not 74 Gold THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT, FINANCE & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAGAZINE OF CYPRUS main_story_paying.indd 74 07/11/2013 17:35