Gold Magazine March - April 2013, Issue 24 | Página 62

DEBT countries of the euro area have mandated the inclusion of an aggregated collective action clause (CAC) in every eurozone sovereign bond issued after January 1, 2013. Collective action clauses are a supportive tool to debt restructuring. “They have clearly sent the message to creditors that, if there is a future debt problem in any of the euro area countries, they will restructure its debt,” he explains. “For bonds that mature in the future, the Europeans have already philosophically embraced debt restructuring. CACs say that if there is a super majority of affected creditors who decide that the restructuring is necessary, this majority should be able to bind any minority that takes a different view,” Buchheit notes, adding, “Otherwise, if the minority are allowed to recover the full amount of their claims, the money will have to come from the people who have been restructured.” So is he suggesting that investors should assume responsibility for buying sovereign bonds? “Exactly! Every investor who buys a corporate bond or a loan knows that if the company gets into trouble he might find himself in Chapter 11 or some equivalent bankruptcy regime. That has not stopped investors from buying corporate bonds. It is a fantasy to think that an investor in sovereign debt would run away from all debt instruments because he might be brought into a debt restructuring against his will.” Public or official sector involvement (OSI) in sovereign debt restructurings is currently considered anathema, as eurozone leaders’ statements and the facts have shown. Will there be a time when the official sector will get involved? “I do not think that it is possible before the German election this year,” says Buchheit. “Ask me the same question the same day next year and I will an swer ‘yes’.” For Buchheit, OSI is the almost inevitable consequence of the policy that Europeans have chosen to implement. “They chose to pay out the existing creditors in full. In doing so, they took the risk that if the country eventually needed a debt restructuring in order to achieve a sustainable debt profile, that restructuring was going to affect them. Why they could not see that at the beginning I don’t know but they certainly have seen it now! The moment they perceived that as a threat in Greece, they instantly switched to saying, ‘Bring the private creditors in to save us from doing something’. In fact there has already IT IS A FANTASY TO THINK THAT AN INVESTOR IN SOVEREIGN DEBT WOULD RUN AWAY FROM ALL DEBT INSTRUMENTS BECAUSE HE MIGHT BE BROUGHT INTO A DEBT RESTRUCTURING AGAINST HIS WILL been OSI. It hasn’t involved a haircut but they have extended for a very long time, they have cut the interest rate all the way down. They already done everything they could apart from haircutting the principal. So OSI has already come. This time next year they may decide to extend the maturities until the end of time. That is something which will not change the debt-to-GDP percentage of a country but it will certainly give the country decades in which it can borrow from the private market without worrying about the official sector repayments.” According to Lee Buchheit, the world’s debtor countries have five options at their disposal to deal with their debts. One of them has been adopted by Spain and Italy which have announced and implemented voluntary fiscal adjustment programmes. “Their aim, of course, is to restore their fiscal situation and convince the markets to continue lending them at reasonable interest rates,” he explains. Option two is to give yields a “massage”, in other words to have active official state intervention or ECB purchases of bonds to keep market rates low. Alternatively the state could offer asset-backed bonds, allowing them to be accepted by the market but for these, Buchheit points out, “the track record is not considered good”. Buchheit’s third option entails a full bailout in the case where the debtor state is unable to pay its maturing loans (as in the case of Cyprus). Germany and other eurozone countries (i.e. their citizens) pay the cost through loans. There is, though, a fourth option: debt restructuring which might include a moratorium on payments, extending the repayment period or reducing the interest rates. In such a case, the lenders pay part of the cost either in terms of current prices or through a loss of net present value. The fifth and final option is a Greek-style restructuring that includes a haircut loss for lenders. What is Lee Buchheit’s prediction for Cyprus? He is not entirely sure. “Cyprus has a maturity of €1.4 billion due in June, which is roughly equal to 8.5% of the country’s GDP. I don’t think Cyprus has the money to pay that on its own and it does not enjoy access to the markets that will allow it to borrow the money. So, one of two things must happen,” he says. “Either the official sector gives Cyprus the money to repay its loans or it doesn’t. If it doesn’t, that’s just another word for restructuring. If it does, it puts itself on the path that started in Greece but was reconsidered. We will have to wait and see. I honestly don’t know what choice they are going to make. The relative smallness of Cyprus in the overall scheme of things can be seen as either good or bad. You can argue that the amount of money necessary to bail out Cyprus is so small that even if the official sector ends up taking all the Cypriot debt stock on its own shoulders and then has to restructure it, it’s not that much money. The other side of the argument says that if you want to send the message that the Europeans are no longer in the business of monetizing debt instruments and paying back existing creditors who have made a bad decision, what better place to do it than in a small country?” Doesn’t the fact that a large part of the Cypriot debt is owned by Cypriot institutions place a serious obstacle in the way of any kind of debt restructuring or haircut? “That is a complication,” Buchheit acknowledges. ”Everyone knows that the banking sector will need to be recapitalized. So, if you were to try to restructure Cypriot sovereign debt in a way that caused losses to the holders, it’s another way of saying that the amount the Republic will save in debt services will have to be paid back in the form of recapitalization. This is a crucial point.” 62 Gold THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT, FINANCE & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAGAZINE OF CYPRUS main_story6_Bunchheit.indd 62 07/03/2013 11:45