Gold Magazine February - March 2013, Issue 23 | Page 82

AUSTERITY FEELTHE PAIN LATVIA’S TURNAROUND SINCE THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS MAY BE A MODEL FOR THE FALTERING COUNTRIES OF SOUTHERN EUROPE. BUT THEY MAY NOT LIKE IT... F By Kyproula Papachristodoulou or countries with flexibility in the labour market and a willingness to suffer serious pain for some time, the solution to bankruptcy is quite simple and, as shown in the case of Latvia, highly effective: austerity, austerity, austerity. That, and strict implementation of the structural reform programme. Latvia is the case which proves the theory which, of course, is not necessarily good news for all problematic European countries: austerity works. Latvia was booming during the decade preceding the recent financial crisis. From the start of the new millennium, its annual GDP growth exceeded 5% and in 2006 it reached its peak, above 10%. The then country went through a huge bubble: public wages grew threefold over the three pre-crisis years (2004-2007) and inflation reached double-digit figures in 2008 (reaching an all time high of 17.7% in May 2008) while a huge construction and real estate bubble was evident. This all came to a sudden end in 2008 and, over the next two years, the country lost a cumulative 25% of GDP while unemployment soared from 6.7% in 2006 to over 20% in 2010. All of the above have since been quite effectively dealt with and, as a result, the country is again enjoying growth – as the best performer in the European Union – as well as falling unemployment and international admiration for its accomplishments and most importantly for its ability to adopt and implement the IMF-EU fiscal consolidation programme. The country today provides a boost to champions of the proposition that “pain pays”. “We are here to celebrate your achievements,” IMF Head Christine Lagarde, told a confer- ence in the Latvian capital Riga, last summer. The Fund was “proud to have been part of Latvia’s success story,” she said. Pre-crisis problem November 2008 was the starting point of Latvia’s severe economic and financial adventures. The downfall of the country’s second largest bank, Parex Banka, as a result of the Lehman Brothers collapse, was the event that triggered the crisis. Parex Banka had to be nationalized with a total state contribution of €1.4 billion. CDS spreads grew eight times (from over 100 basis points spread to over 1,000 bp spread) while the country lost market access and its credit rating was reduced to junk status. Latvia had to ask for financial assistance from the IMF and its European partners. The total amount received, after agreeing to a tough Memorandum of Understanding which included extensive public sector firings and huge salary cuts, totalled €7.5 billion. The crisis hit hard indeed but, as the IMF and EU appraisal later concluded, the action taken by the government was rapid, deep and extensive. As a result, Latvia is now the fastest-growing EU Member State with an estimated GDP growth in 2012 of 5.5%. It has set itself the target of adopting the euro on 1 January 2014. Solving the problem The country’s approach towards solving the crisis puzzle was clear and simple in theory but hard when it came to implementation. The main objective was to stabilize state finances and the financial system as soon as possible, while maintaining the currency’s euro peg by taking the internal devaluation route. At the same time, it set about improving administrative efficiency, pursued a tax system, health and education reform and tried to stimulate the economy with the help of EU funds. The fiscal consolidation undertaken from 2009-2012 amounted to 17% of the country’s GDP. One third of fiscal consolidation came in tax increases, and two thirds came in expenditure cuts. Almost all possible taxes were raised (and tax exemptions minimized for personal income tax). As to the expenditure cuts, the public wage bill was reduced by 40% and the size of the public sector was significantly reduced (about one third of staff was dismissed). More specifically, within four years the budget expenditure for state remuneration had decreased by 46% and the number of persons employed in state budget institutions fallen from 78,900 80 Gold THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT, FINANCE & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAGAZINE OF CYPRUS main_story8_latvia.indd 80 01/02/2013 12:34