Global Custodian Spring 2020 | Page 22

[ N E W S R E V I E W | D I G I TA L A S S E T S ] State Street and BNY Mellon outline their stance on digital assets and why they are not ignoring the phenomenon T he world’s two largest custodian banks have answered the question of why they are actively engaging in conversations around cryptocurrencies despite not being able to provide custody services for the burgeoning digital assets at this moment in time. Speaking at DAS: London, representa- tives from BNY Mellon and State Street confirmed, firstly, that as asset servicers they have to be well-positioned should the regulatory, legal and risk frameworks come into place for investing in digital assets. In addition, with some of their clients already engaged in digital asset investment and requesting services, both parties are keeping their eyes wide open to future possibilities. State Street has launched a digital asset back-office reporting pilot, in collabora- tion with crypto exchange and custodian Gemini Trust, adopting an open architec- ture approach to give its traditional asset management clients a solution if they one- day need it. Meanwhile, BNY Mellon made its first foray into the digital asset servicing space with a partnership with Bakkt, the digital currency exchange operated by Intercontinental Exchange (ICE). While neither of these moves involve the 22 Global Custodian Spring 2020 Should the regulatory, legal and risk frameworks come into place for digital assets, State Street and BNY Mellon plan to be there to offer services for their respective clients. private keys of digital assets being stored at the incumbent custody providers, it’s an exploratory and low-risk venture for the banking giants, which shows willingness without compromising their values or reputation. BNY Mellon also said it is also exploring asset tokenisation opportunities with its fund management clients through proof of concepts, while it’s cross-town rival State Street is equally as optimistic about the potential of notion. “There is one side we can’t ignore and one side we shouldn’t ignore,” said Kara Kennedy, custody product manager, di- rector, BNY Mellon, when asked by Global Custodian what the bank’s intentions were around engaging in digital assets. “The first is around tokenisation of securities and assets, that’s our business today. To negate looking forward to how this technology can transform this market would be bad for our business. We have to be aware of these changes and how they can affect our market, because the opportunity for this technology is significant, particularly in terms of the potential efficiencies it can bring. “On the cryptocurrency side, that’s a mar- ket opportunity. Clients are interested and we again want to be able to service them across multiple asset types, but we won’t be ready to get into that space until we have the appropriate legal, regulatory and risk frameworks to provide that.” Awaiting full commitment Both the relatively-new universe of digital asset platforms and the traditional capital markets players are looking to the likes of BNY Mellon and State Street, along with other top-tier asset servicers, to solve the custody conundrum for cryptocurrencies. While the potential of digital assets is vast, the largest institutional investors are unlikely to fully commit to investing in the