Global Custodian Fall 2018 | Page 100

[ S U R V E Y | A G E N T B A N K S I N M A J O R M A R K E T S ] United States BNP Paribas Securities Services In 2012 the French bank made a bold move for a sub-custodi- an servicing American global custodians. It launched a direct custody and clearing operation to look after the domestic assets of foreign banks and brokers in the United States. Judging by these results and those of 2016 and 2017 – it top-scored in both years – the move has fulfilled the expectations of its progeni- tors. BNP Paribas has won some large mandates and introduced an integrated brokerage and custody service that has gained a following. The scoring of RMs, a useful proxy for what clients really think, is outstanding. The bank has an edge in blockchain, AI, robotics, Big Data and cyber-security that the scores for innovation and data security record. Client service and tech- nology were obviously affected by a problematic upgrade at the turn of the year. Respondents would like BNP Paribas to pass on as price cuts any savings it makes. Corporate actions and proxy voting are problematic here, as they are everywhere. In cash and FX, there are issues, but mainly of choice rather than competi- tiveness or transparency. Importantly, BNP Paribas here share the universal disappointment at the inability of custodians to take their capital and collateral costs seriously. Brown Brothers Harriman The doyen of this market attracts fewer respondents than of old, but it is still getting the human side right, even if the averages do not bear this out on all points. “Great support from the relation- ship and client services team,” writes a respondent. A firm that has always seen technology as crucial to its ability to compete will be pleased to out-perform the benchmarks for innovation and technology. BBH under-performs in unexpected (account management) as well as expected areas (corporate actions, cash and FX), but clients do at least appreciate the risk-reducing properties of a conservative balance sheet. BNY Mellon This is a performance that will disappoint. Respondents find the bank makes it relatively easy to open an account, and they are confident it can settle trades into the account and safekeep the assets once they are there. But they show little no confidence in the ability of the bank to service the assets with flair, or finance them efficiently, and they want more choice and fuller disclo- sure when it comes to cash management and FX execution. Respondents also have nothing flattering to say about the level and structure of the prices charged. Citi The settlement service and the technology scores are as strong here anywhere, and respondents are confident that Citi can protect their cash and securities, from regulators as well as other forms of risk. But it is hard to identify other areas of strength. J.P. Morgan The bank attracted enough responses to warrant an assessment. The responses it received include some surprising findings about client attitudes, especially in asset safety. WEIGHTED AVERAGE SCORES BNP Paribas Brown Brothers Harriman BNY Mellon Citi J.P. Morgan Market share (% of responses) 36% 16% 24% 16% 7% Relationship management 6.14 5.04 4.54 4.94 Client service 5.22 5.49 4.96 Account management 5.37 4.60 5.44 Asset safety 5.90 6.00 Risk management 5.28 6.12 Liquidity management 5.44 Regulation and compliance 5.88 Innovation Asset servicing Market Average Global Average 5.63 5.22 5.20 5.00 4.70 5.12 5.40 5.02 6.07 5.18 5.44 5.62 5.26 5.06 5.47 5.68 4.76 5.21 6.05 5.52 5.46 4.65 4.05 4.09 4.88 4.70 4.89 5.83 5.09 5.60 5.89 5.53 5.64 5.89 5.34 4.77 5.33 5.63 5.30 5.18 5.31 5.43 4.68 4.79 6.00 5.05 5.09 Pricing 4.99 5.33 4.14 4.61 6.00 4.76 4.82 Technology 5.21 5.58 4.78 5.08 4.63 5.19 5.28 Cash management and FX 5.05 4.68 2.91 3.74 6.00 4.05 4.25 Total 5.50 5.35 4.69 4.94 5.54 5.15 5.24 100 Global Custodian Fall 2018